[netmod] [Errata Rejected] RFC8349 (6251)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 14 August 2020 17:42 UTC

To: tsaad@juniper.net, lhotka@nic.cz, acee@cisco.com, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200814174156.B59EEF40740@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:41:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TGU8ay2I4b6nyZVLg5cqyQmBZgQ>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Rejected] RFC8349 (6251)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8349,
"A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6251

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
Date Reported: 2020-08-07
Rejected by: Rob Wilton (IESG)

Section: 7

Original Text
-------------
The RPC "active-route" is used to retrieve the active route in a RIB.
RFC8349 defined two AFIs (v4/v6).

draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang is defining a new RIB AFI for MPLS as per section 3 in RFC8349.

The RPC has a "MUST" statement that all RIBs must augment input
parameters with a leaf named 'destination-address'.

For MPLS RIB, it makes sense to augment with leaf named 'local-label' since MPLS routes are identified by MPLS label.

We ask to make the following change:

OLD:
action active-route {
description
"Return the active RIB route that is used for the
destination address.

Address-family-specific modules MUST augment input
parameters with a leaf named 'destination-address'.";

Corrected Text
--------------
NEW:
action active-route {
description
"Return the active RIB route that is used for the
destination address.

Address-family-specific modules MUST augment input
parameters with a suitable leaf that identifies the route.";

Notes
-----

--VERIFIER NOTES--
After discussion between the submitter and authors of the RFC it was agreed that the errata should be rejected.

--------------------------------------
RFC8349 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-11)
--------------------------------------
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)
Publication Date : March 2018
Author(s) : L. Lhotka, A. Lindem, Y. Qu
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Network Modeling
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

[netmod] [Errata Rejected] RFC8349 (6251) RFC Errata System