[netmod] Clarification on deviating type resolve scope?
"Peter Lundell (plundell)" <plundell@cisco.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <plundell@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF67C3A0D2A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:49:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fcb0mcjo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=XEe1TffL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jU8zXVCbGml0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603273A0D29 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:49:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2194; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1613742584; x=1614952184; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=qhxv2XwM9jCmyJt/Su34s4hB1HQao5mGqfx6P2sEZPw=; b=fcb0mcjoRFk3imE4tzIHNsKKskbl/RCg1b0ZUvRL0XvS2DLn3mBfrGeK sBXK/j/giFclDGDNYW1Em8yyTfH+UA48xUs94aNY+zln7h6VKlt5zS/A/ LAQIPIbSB57Zdb7lvZiFnjjTgDPSjqEJo8KAnsvwdZEzt/0DtTDPwErTe Q=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0DUAgAzwC9gmIoNJK1igQmBT4EjMFGBVzYxCod/A6I6hHOBLoElA1QLAQEBDQEBMgIEAQGETQKCDAIlNgcOAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBAQGGNgEMhwsBATgRAQwBcycEG4JjgX9SBQMuAaNmAooldIE0gwQBAQaFKxiCEgmBOIJ2hAWCU4QZHIFBQYFUgiIHhSyDSIIrhCWBJEObeIFKiwWRSwqCe5wyo0CUR6IJAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFbAi+BWXAVgyRQFwINjjiDVopZczcCBgoBAQMJfIoIAYEOAQE
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:4HclnhZPe9pusDRl/ILgv9r/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QaTD4TW9/wCjPDZ4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTAQMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS8fze1OUpWe9vnYeHxzlPl9zIeL4UofZk8Ww0bW0/JveKwVFjTawe/V8NhKz+A7QrcIRx4BlL/U8
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,189,1610409600"; d="scan'208,217";a="649816199"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Feb 2021 13:49:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 11JDnhUd010182 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:49:43 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-005.cisco.com (173.37.135.125) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:49:42 -0600
Received: from xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) by xfe-aln-005.cisco.com (173.37.135.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:49:42 -0600
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:49:42 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SErA6dC90W0RTc0iad5Xl5GVn+tnHaBavSqwrnJtny7fmPfJS4P0gVPq5SEAoLNmxIb1AvPqy71VFgvh9RCTniW7kV2MseIWYhySLqjOp08oyKD797R3U1cIqrWoWqTvUxVd1CnQRyugiZ2YOo31A+KNjrs1XZnpU/XamCIdj8el5wzPXiC5T8gxOoaLNMxRwglZpurU7o8YPg5PBCb6CJMn2C/WtIq8ZPFKHf74o1XtEj3ge5CdyjacSc4fWpMxvGLPuUfqIOqlW7HDQKplvJulcmMxtPhdG3kB2jqeVb/JG3cn31Pzztxy1rTuYPiYaMNfnYnUh0oR7EvMxyewFQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qhxv2XwM9jCmyJt/Su34s4hB1HQao5mGqfx6P2sEZPw=; b=N+OJvyaRnBiIqgplpL/BYgsLeyR0Qw5DeOxd165qUxuwae51douupHiaHuQISLj8eDwPPrDqiMiA63dHL7QJHVbo6c5KHkm2ufdTOFaL89lmbe9lDferttpSGNvEDwgy6Tt9g1cKsCHswxEHjXkVlnvylMktg1BRt7gnVA2vieluAwyF28/1lLS1vaBaYMCgKkOvB38mMDTnyVkeOj1WAEu2lDJ4ltAQUuIGYW1S1vPUL86ETB9qVLxd5uRX/BGABdqFgjMAaDvBpd6RFcfBc1EQxlkTG+5pCoGd650knRmToG3zessRbTHcZ2LhYLvVXbaXj9hH1sdcBBsqlmLLXg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qhxv2XwM9jCmyJt/Su34s4hB1HQao5mGqfx6P2sEZPw=; b=XEe1TffLhk7tBdVUKY0V02VCMSkK9WcJrkE6R/6l5Q2lDfVUViI8hwppGMmr1Cv/vfx6A479l9vIWLieUrPhlWKHsxC3kGVlg88rt19gY7Vvp8GUQWJecA3fLA4qFquhkT7TxB5xYJQ6rodL2OHvHNk30K4Zgi3D06QzerItBFI=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:e::29) by DM6PR11MB4508.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:200::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3868.29; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:49:41 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f45c:6864:b8f8:d4c8]) by DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f45c:6864:b8f8:d4c8%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3846.038; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:49:41 +0000
From: "Peter Lundell (plundell)" <plundell@cisco.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Clarification on deviating type resolve scope?
Thread-Index: AQHXBsWtspGZnG4vd0uu/CA9xLGXTA==
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:49:41 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB3161A7FBFD19B872F29AD0ADC6849@DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [64.103.40.17]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9157536a-215f-432b-5108-08d8d4dd3514
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4508:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB4508D63B93620762C3440889C6849@DM6PR11MB4508.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: +PaFNEbz09lLSeCjsOGLTuwonyIF2rgQuD0yVEvA3YOEYnBS3vQs2Gr9dkYFZp7FeiABvDULU7UH3KKNobrAI5OGfQjAfJcyoWLXoKE4fhqYk3rqKwow6G9oInYcTH38WaTW6PtYHyrKoOwVPNvpIdfw7kVRbCCeiRFxFmyiSR+4GC2Dut4SCm5c+yMqyRKlWgZQLcj9AyhtsQQ5VSfR9DbwLGd5G9tq4lLUuoYuhBtyotDbW0jPR5hfFyIpqvvCXmVh9wSRDn8BkKYSI88iIoOKPfUOOxYQiXPezn/KpoH1NCngJR/JJ0qNzaiyNxEJ+Y2Zb6GVWCYuLkVofFIULgpRDNWHamlaIlVRch4Jo4bsFZL79H/UXkjFvubwPF2izVCxGlu6qPC6/CuUMjLyozqwtcEObZwplvnFFc5DJUXXQp1ODkwQTAQTC6aZtHgaH7SKNeYmIp+8mL/xkanBo7C0Rm3jv1nr3s3vj2kwuqxZ4jDorOOWj/YKkd3vvoaVZW8K66AHVgWlVLzJxmj2FQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(26005)(186003)(33656002)(86362001)(19627405001)(64756008)(5660300002)(316002)(76116006)(6916009)(6506007)(66446008)(52536014)(8936002)(8676002)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(4744005)(478600001)(7696005)(71200400001)(55016002)(2906002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR11MB3161A7FBFD19B872F29AD0ADC6849DM6PR11MB3161namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB3161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9157536a-215f-432b-5108-08d8d4dd3514
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Feb 2021 13:49:41.5400 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /eisvRVaDz/Y1W0Ev6p6XdhAAxV5VqyM5pWB1Pq7JY5zn4uCamuKxJK8zRrKiHLdCRYfdJXJbDhMl0rohh+CMg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4508
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/UCCwIVh5RMQO86XoSnKikeLKVnM>
Subject: [netmod] Clarification on deviating type resolve scope?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:49:46 -0000
Hi all. I'm working with an issue involving a deviate replace type and the problem is where the type should be resolved. The scope in which the deviated property is resolved in is not explicitly stated in RFC 7950 (7.20.3.2). This would have impact when replacing the type, both when it's prefixed and when it's not. It does seem logical, and also in line with the rest of the RFC, to evaluate the replaced property in deviating module scope and not target module scope. Can deviating module scope be assumed? Should the RFC be clarified and the scope explicitly stated? BR /Peter Lundell
- [netmod] Clarification on deviating type resolve … Peter Lundell (plundell)
- Re: [netmod] Clarification on deviating type reso… Martin Björklund