[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (7021)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 July 2022 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B000C14F743 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5-_GQrl3-Ae for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8370CC14F74F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3B62B4C0A1; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: mbj@tail-f.com, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, joelja@bogus.com, lberger@labn.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220712154135.3B62B4C0A1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:41:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Vo46Ey17J9LVoX6rNgBKL15_jY4>
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (7021)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:41:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7021 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Section: 11 Original Text ------------- A definition in a published module may be revised in any of the following ways: o An "enumeration" type may have new enums added, provided the old enums's values do not change. Note that inserting a new enum before an existing enum or reordering existing enums will result in new values for the existing enums, unless they have explicit values assigned to them. Corrected Text -------------- A definition in a published module may be revised in any of the following ways: o The "revision-date" substatement of an existing "import" statement may get a changed argument. o An "enumeration" type may have new enums added, provided the old enums's values do not change. Note that inserting a new enum before an existing enum or reordering existing enums will result in new values for the existing enums, unless they have explicit values assigned to them. Notes ----- In section 5.1.1 it is stated that a module may be republished with an updated "import" statement. This is needed, otherwise a user of the revision-date statement (inside an import) would never be able to migrate to a newer version of the imported module. However in section 11. Updating a Module this change is not listed in the list of allowed updates, thus it is forbidden. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Publication Date : August 2016 Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (702… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Rob Wilton (rwilton)