[netmod] questions about revision-label-scheme extension
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 26 June 2023 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A8FC151085 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tg8gA7cKhXNG for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 621BEC151079 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f86dbce369so4606990e87.0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks.com; s=google; t=1687797634; x=1690389634; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FNSov7bA8F56C4fGcwHeTcSF29hHUl49XWDx/WW+6A=; b=qG40Up00jw9dJ0n4ohW5RaoFloSiCPLnwx4jCxCp6qS2vbA7TC1GjBsJgjJmDPltfk Fj9iCnMg0Btj1SErEoHBIfl43g/A5VY5pmQWlVplder9xEGa87lrQG399xgq2StmP7e+ joFpkYBu5QTGJuixNpJ4REE9yBylSMg2CTviBMargLV0DHBAZrjRPwlb+5k6QjP8aTsm vP13Djm2fT4PQ1atePghU2XqHSWLeYUnC5pw4WMBpjU+c7+29i5hue29NOscr4NfdFBi 7kcVRse63f8YvLr8fgviDi4LbrOzFCnRpaBjAtXMpWIVfYfvIb4KlHNJFcoMjzPe1Uhk OZig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687797634; x=1690389634; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0FNSov7bA8F56C4fGcwHeTcSF29hHUl49XWDx/WW+6A=; b=M1mPsXp6IxFOMn6bJ4ihtsuGk3i3oB9L433eEKQhOs31WVKGKOft3pI+eUGzBK8sUN um1Yb17l379ZDKrKvYOKy5xlylt3kzsh8He8gba+OyETcs9DGshHgFv/evK+Y5nliGNA JEHkVs0ptd79IiQBOBFlJKQzrACxk0Po+kVjXLj6rEHh+JCrZMXzuXSr7dR0xtykqW86 V8AVbdZKAnGxfKS7OcmOSQJZe6t7EVV1r4KpmjJLCoD5c2Vh8En9WkoeUfiPjatQHUGD r2I+w//TFVe0tfKP5QP2Ya4872oWDsyvqk6k3pWb9ZzJeMGVv0xa5VMtLg7Bpttq52md 9l5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwIuPjIYpJ+Hh+NpYGOyf6suWq8ld8vSdGlH0MXCUYjpjCSrAEm uGsEYTjTL+5CoJxaRyHoJfDfKxHHtfsSOjsechK5Yv/q3ReObBGH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4e8JClLQQIc0jwI7BYkDOgGX7MR1wpLg9VK4iEFJhg1+RL9FyhJIzorU4F50ni0lo059RXwkqVi8GR4QjvNBk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4bcf:0:b0:4f9:644c:1ec5 with SMTP id o15-20020ac24bcf000000b004f9644c1ec5mr8382995lfq.36.1687797633892; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:40:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTMg9Yd7vUUJMJJ1gmeU+ZLW=8u-LdPNsOeXo0zuB-mGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006bdd6b05ff0b028f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Y2WBmWv_FNYfuFVZswgR4GR2KFs>
Subject: [netmod] questions about revision-label-scheme extension
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:41:11 -0000
Hi, It is not really clear how this extension works. This extension is used to specify the format and semantics of the 'label' and 'recommended-min' argument string contents. Q1) What specific requirements (if any) are being addressed by this solution? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08#name-the-problem-statement Q2) What happens if the revision-label-scheme value is changed in a new revision of the module? Are all of the existing label and scattered recommended-min statements changed to the new scheme? Q3) How is it possible to use recommended-min without knowing the revision scheme for the imported module (or included submodule)? This is defined in the imported module. IMO allowing every module or submodule to use a different versioning system does not work. Each system will define its own extensions anyway. E.g., a tool will look for the 'openconfig-version' extension if it supports OpenConfig. Andy
- [netmod] questions about revision-label-scheme ex… Andy Bierman