Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8528 (6857)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 09 March 2022 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090843A0E38 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56pS6CILHXr7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DDE3A0E22 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4462C427C643; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PsrafZxgONKi; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C6C7425C194; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220222073124.49667F0FBA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:56:03 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30B483EC-722D-4380-8781-38313927C891@amsl.com>
References: <20220222073124.49667F0FBA@rfc-editor.org>
To: kokkiknamtan42@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, lhotka@nic.cz, netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Y4d6LOnr8OHcraOWu6fgV6LL0RE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8528 (6857)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 21:56:10 -0000

Greetings,

EID 6857 is almost identical to EID 5797.  They differ in the enabled field (one says true, one says false). Please let me know which errata is correct.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Feb 21, 2022, at 11:31 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8528,
> "YANG Schema Mount".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6857
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Kokkiknamtan <kokkiknamtan42@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: A.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>  {
>     "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
>       "interface": [
>         {
>           "name": "eth0",
>           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
>           "enabled": false,
>           "ietf-logical-network-element:bind-lne-name": "eth0"
>         }
>       ]
>     },
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> {
>     "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
>       "interface": [
>         {
>           "name": "eth0",
>           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
>           "enabled": false,
>           "ietf-logical-network-element:bind-lne-name": "lne-1"
>         }
>       ]
>     },
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> leafref is for an LNE name, not an interface name
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8528 (draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : YANG Schema Mount
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, L. Lhotka
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>