IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 30 May 2018 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A85C12EBD4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DK7oNynhk5TO for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anna.localdomain (firewallix.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F1612DA14 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1D60321A1D50; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:56:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:56:40 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180530105640.rwjsdkghb3lvyzqo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB23B2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <71e76c7e-4043-d80a-73ac-1759e85cc5d7@cisco.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB241F@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <c8d34f1f-8dcc-2915-0d77-98300ae8067e@cisco.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB2C11@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180530053933.jvzkjgfnhxvhdmak@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB2F8A@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180530065737.tkntrvzc2kulk6ex@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB30EB@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB30EB@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180512
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Z29YckuB8DxO2kJYarCF0O4fBEs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:56:44 -0000

The phrase 'will be defined' is not good. Anyway, for a notification
nested in data tree, the data tree must exist in <operational> and
the context in which XPath expressions are evaluated is <operational>,
see section 6.1. of RFC 8342.

/js

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:38:05AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
> 
> Modules which define only notifications(ietf-netconf-notifications) will be defined in <operational> data-store ONLY. Right ?
> 
> With Regards,
> Rohit R Ranade
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
> Sent: 30 May 2018 12:28
> To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
> Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:40:02AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> 
> > A module having only "ro" nodes , can be considered to be implemented 
> > in any data-store ? operational/ephemeral etc
> 
> No.
> 
> > A module having "rw" nodes,  what is the rules for it to be considered implemented in a data-store ?
> 
> You implement the set of nodes that the datastore supports. In case of a config false module and a conventional configuration datastore, this set is empty.
>  
> > RFC 7950 is quite clear for the rules for when a module is considered implemented. Please clarify implementation with respect to data-store also.
> 
> I do not understand why this is unclear.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email