IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] system configuration sync mechanism

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Tue, 03 August 2021 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <0100017b099998ea-5c3d114d-fa6f-4f00-bdf8-7aa6447ceef3-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998303A07C4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Johe0FI8Fhyc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0FFB3A07BF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1627953666; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=QUoEmOKIjotDYhJppFsTI36ghGrjviAdcl6MUfbizwo=; b=RvKytrXtMeV0TxHOT1SZu9Qy8NPuAVVG1wozl9IsaOwOWeLRSrinf0E80lbcHDVs gbjYBHfdat5K4fvXuIegpw6wvnmg9Hi1gVmOChBoFzyFHApCB/Mh+8Kx5KDACTfjwal Sy+6b1N8wDJ1FUDJwj0iWcJT6iAMkkRqwds5C22Q=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100017b099998ea-5c3d114d-fa6f-4f00-bdf8-7aa6447ceef3-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_440D41E4-F48E-47B3-9D5D-874F7E387D81"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 01:21:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHT59+sf92vzj=qE0KPxic-h6Nix2+Mp5veforS02Xchgg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "maqiufang (A)" <maqiufang1@huawei.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
References: <5b76dae2175545959f0006b036efd647@huawei.com> <2d1262bc90fc49d08eb641365b959ea4@huawei.com> <0100017aab854793-eb989e55-8496-451b-84de-7f17cb0720d5-000000@email.amazonses.com> <add2ee3bb9094e1da6a3160824d5fdff@huawei.com> <0100017aee17493f-6b9b747c-f0f1-4a70-b929-aaa0350a555f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <aa3dfdb471f0430aa50c4e35b9672fb1@huawei.com> <AM8PR07MB823008D0A83507EFCBD2DDA3F0ED9@AM8PR07MB8230.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHT6yGFj84ryK9wghFnO52uQoLydKm-OU9M5+gqqs4jAzA@mail.gmail.com> <0100017b08feb7ef-71cbbcaa-256f-4947-ab27-9fdd40f2993a-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHT59+sf92vzj=qE0KPxic-h6Nix2+Mp5veforS02Xchgg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.08.03-54.240.8.96
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/_Sz_2x5mqFkIJvAhcApFZUNFvVA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] system configuration sync mechanism
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 01:21:10 -0000


> I prefer neither.
> I think NMDA <get-data> with an origin-filter and/or with-origin parameter already solves this problem. 

Some of the nodes defined in <system> may be referenced by nodes defined in <running>.  There is a desire for the <system> nodes to not be defined only in <operational>, for online/offline validation.

K.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email