IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7EE1B41E5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:16:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPpQ9AagbK4K for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0A11AC3D7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:16:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2889; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456226190; x=1457435790; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=izuzHYkawBicb1oBV5NYrhxp/yCBtUguaF32dL+kKVU=; b=BbwaGLjOkTK3zYKaZh2T1YnHy8qNEf9PhU9RCjVllofl1PY0Q7AwubGl KFytIMCHuKJqJKf8gJWPN0aMJHz86DZ/0NhFGZanZsGU06ce1XjYNrXE0 xPiXZdICHUdUQ0N9umq+Zcy4dQUNWzQj7pF5UKynWxzmvttCJHPZ6F++g I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CvBAAZPsxW/xbLJq1ehAxtvFkXCoUiSgKCEQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEEAQEBIA8BBTYKAQwECw4DBAEBAQICBRYIAwICCQMCAQIBFR8JCAYNBgIBAYgXDqxbjwABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERBHuFF4Q6hDODAoE6AQSXB4VXiAeBXIRDgwKFUIVyiFdig2U7Log5AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,489,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="635672569"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2016 11:16:28 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1NBGSR9008266; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:16:28 GMT
To: William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <3D09C93F-EA97-4E60-B89C-E077CA1DD66B@broadband-forum.org> <6E0FC5E2-AC0C-40B8-BB46-44B9877CE39A@lucidvision.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC13F2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <A69780D3-E65B-41E9-B3F4-4FFF98B7C228@lucidvision.com> <566F15F3.4060408@cisco.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC7616@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <3511C7D2-442E-44B6-8A0F-DE8472614CAD@broadband-forum.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56CC3F8C.2090304@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:16:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3511C7D2-442E-44B6-8A0F-DE8472614CAD@broadband-forum.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/b8XemyjiA3zvyA6950Eoafg1c8s>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:16:37 -0000

Dear all,

It would be great if we can receive a status update on the Entity YANG 
model from the design team.
And a milestone on the NETMOD charter would also make sense.

Regards, Benoit
> Is there a status update on ietf-entity please? I don't see it as a milestone in the charter but maybe I don't know where to look.
>
> Message received re YANG 1.1. All BBF YANG will use YANG 1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> William
>
>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:17, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, let's do it. Tom, or one of the other chairs - you need to run this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:18 PM
>>> To: Nadeau Thomas; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>>> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG
>>> module
>>>
>>>
>>>> 	I personally don’t see anything that prevents this.
>>> Same opinion here.
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>> 	—Tom
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 13, 2015:6:56 AM, at 6:56 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>>> <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>>>>> Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from running a
>>> short consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones?
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nadeau
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:27 PM
>>>>>> To: William Lupton
>>>>>> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity
>>>>>> YANG module
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 	Dependance on 1.1 should not be an issue as that is almost ready to
>>>>>> be approved. You should be building your model to comply with the 1.1
>>> rules.
>>>>>> 	—Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2015:8:00 AM, at 8:00 AM, William Lupton
>>>>>> <wlupton@broadband-forum.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Broadband Forum would like to use the ietf-entity YANG module
>>>>>> (currently draft-entitydt-netmod-entity) for equipment management
>>>>>> but we are a bit concerned about its draft status and its dependence on
>>> YANG 1.1.
>>>>>> Any advice or reassurance?
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> William
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mail
>>> man_listinfo_netmod&d=BQIDaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGx
>>> R31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=9jKcR2EbKD3lb73tciJMJAk0J6
>>> 2dQAbsU_4R85zluXs&s=eBlkOZe4c5IXMoz_2YJnIKglubNBDQmS0Ej03Al8meI
>>> &e=
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email