IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] ro presence containers

"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com> Thu, 04 May 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E6C12943C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdpjGkLelxGl for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2D2128C82 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=esojaENN/vN1gMDH1kV+tJz4Hj+wvJwBqGWnuD2KpyQ=; b=RkMF8M1dvqT1ESKaKHiThnwpbDdUiGtLbJ7bqMbi4ims7/OQdGfGb21w4AEB35ctYfpmXZs61mdo5IBZm5uv/qSVnIiD5rP2Oi+0ZgeMPRDCkEEdOu3EfBGzemBn+bmtq7GepO+rUsLc7y0ns4B+lMdxwbNxt26ETr40aHGj31g=
Received: from HE1PR07MB0843.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.24.16) by HE1PR07MB0844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.24.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.1; Thu, 4 May 2017 17:25:03 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB0843.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.24.16]) by HE1PR07MB0843.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.24.16]) with mapi id 15.01.1075.007; Thu, 4 May 2017 17:25:03 +0000
From: "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ro presence containers
Thread-Index: AdLE+q/2E+skZtN4RTCTbqGWDo+8XQ==
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 17:25:02 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB084362B5A8BC0A711DDA4EEC9BEA0@HE1PR07MB0843.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jason.sterne@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR07MB0844; 7:E/LSbRwBuAb59zbRvTbVHZfBxWyJZD3OcHvp79/PnsH92n6qAYRA70t7a2CVYkn8+tbhU+TXtqN5djHcXRZtvxADAxV9Q/uqI6ffa4+w+biS2Y9XD/sxWZScGK0fwTLQT/YWf+O0uScJ4ynSkid0mIjybKOUbikfCJfO9GeSn6hCoHtzwp+2pQ1kh5rXAjii7YBMlCXrfts17pLMRapgHhtALkLAIlyx8YFKaZ+MiLpLXS3EXhdpWsis6j7cxe8Gd/RDa70cuVvJItgh1K/rQ7r2yQ4oA0yd+JAchtSzhUXvtTj0xHDO5u41fKSx5a2oUzW3Ns+8Ggh6GTmmIR4oAQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d80e8e4e-a2c4-412b-dde2-08d493127fec
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:HE1PR07MB0844;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB0844F73F1D9CB9B74C69006F9BEA0@HE1PR07MB0844.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(6072148); SRVR:HE1PR07MB0844; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR07MB0844;
x-forefront-prvs: 02973C87BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(39850400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(53754006)(3846002)(5630700001)(19609705001)(790700001)(6916009)(86362001)(50986999)(54356999)(7736002)(122556002)(5660300001)(2900100001)(6116002)(102836003)(3660700001)(7116003)(3280700002)(25786009)(77096006)(2501003)(7696004)(2906002)(189998001)(8676002)(6506006)(33656002)(6436002)(3480700004)(6306002)(81166006)(478600001)(55016002)(9686003)(99286003)(38730400002)(66066001)(74316002)(110136004)(8936002)(53936002)(1730700003)(2351001)(5640700003)(54896002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB0844; H:HE1PR07MB0843.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR07MB084362B5A8BC0A711DDA4EEC9BEA0HE1PR07MB0843eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 May 2017 17:25:02.8350 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB0844
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bn6FyHx0c73qvXGcvKZMyOv4WRE>
Subject: [netmod] ro presence containers
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 17:25:08 -0000

Hi all,

Is a ro presence container (config false) a valid concept ?  I couldn't find anything in RFC7950 that says it isn't valid.

Presumably the 'presence' would reflect some internal state of the device (vs some configuration), and could be used to suppress certain leafs from a <get> response (in a similar way that a 'when' statement could suppress a set of leafs from a <get> response).

Rgds,
Jason

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email