Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

On 12/12/2022 1:28 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi Kent, all,
>
> Samier has already replied. Please see attached.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
Forwarding to list -- attachment was stripped from archive...

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:23:22 +0000
From: Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia) <[e-mail]>
To: NetMod WG Chairs <[e-mail]>
CC: NETMOD Group <[e-mail]>, Oscar González de Dios 
<[e-mail]>, BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET 
<[e-mail]>

Dear NETMOD WG chairs, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,

Samier

-----Original Message-----
From: Oscar González de Dios <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 7:16 PM
To: [e-mail]; Lou Berger <[e-mail]>; Samier 
Barguil Giraldo (Nokia) <[e-mail]>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <[e-mail]>; NETMOD Group 
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03

Dear NETMOD WG chairs, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Our co-author Samier has changed affiliation. I add his new email in the 
loop so he can answer to the IPR poll.

Best Regards,

Oscar

-----Mensaje original-----
De: [e-mail] <[e-mail]> Enviado 
el: martes, 6 de diciembre de 2022 7:41
Para: Lou Berger <[e-mail]>; Oscar González de Dios 
<[e-mail]>; SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO 
<[e-mail]>
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <[e-mail]>; NETMOD Group 
<[e-mail]>
Asunto: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03

Hi Lou, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----  > De : Lou Berger <[e-mail]> > Envoyé : lundi 5 décembre 2022 
23:51 > À : OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS 
<[e-mail]>; > 
[e-mail]; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > 
<[e-mail]> Cc : NetMod WG Chairs > 
<[e-mail]>; NETMOD Group <[e-mail]> Objet : > 
Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03 > > Authors, Contributors, WG, 
 > > In preparation for WG Adoption > > Are you aware of any IPR that 
applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, 
I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm 
aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been 
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 
8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > 
 > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > 
or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please 
provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are 
listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the above by 
responding to this email regardless of > whether or not you are aware of 
any relevant IPR. This document will > not advance to the next stage 
until a response has been received from > each author. > > NOTE: THIS 
APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are 
on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not > listed as an 
author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations > under the 
IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if > you are 
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain > from 
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > 
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see > 
https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/ > > Thank you, > Lou and Kent > > PS 
Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > 
response. >