[netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6244 (3356)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 17 September 2012 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22C821F869A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-y02YjsTPMP for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D8A21F8539 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 17AE1B1E003; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: phil@juniper.net, rbonica@juniper.net, bclaise@cisco.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, david.kessens@nsn.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120917161742.17AE1B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:17:42 -0700
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6244 (3356)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:21:11 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6244,
"An Architecture for Network Management Using NETCONF and YANG".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6244&eid=3356

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>

Section: 2.2.3

Original Text
-------------
          augment /ospf:ospf/ospf:area/ospf:interfaces  {
               leaf no-neighbor-down-notification {
                   type empty;
                   description "Don't inform other protocols about"
                             + " neighbor down events";

Corrected Text
--------------
          augment /ospf:ospf/ospf:area/ospf:interface {
               leaf no-neighbor-down-notification {
                   type empty;
                   description "Don't inform other protocols about"
                             + " neighbor down events";

Notes
-----
Section 2.2.3
 For example, if the above OSPF configuration were the standard, a
   vendor module may augment this with vendor-specific extensions.

       module vendorx-ospf {
           namespace "http://vendorx.example.com/ospf";
           prefix vendorx;

           import example-ospf {
               prefix ospf;
           }

           augment /ospf:ospf/ospf:area/ospf:interfaces  {
               leaf no-neighbor-down-notification {
                   type empty;
                   description "Don't inform other protocols about"
                             + " neighbor down events";
               }
           }
       }

While the "above OSPF configuration" refers to interface and not interfaces

   module example-ospf {
           namespace "http://example.org/netconf/ospf";
           prefix ospf;

           import network-types {  // Access another module's def'ns
               prefix nett;
           }

           container ospf {   // Declare the top-level tag
               list area {    // Declare a list of "area" nodes
                   key name;  // The key "name" identifies list members
                   leaf name {
                       type nett:area-id;
                   }
                   list interface {
                       key name;
                       leaf name {
                           type nett:interface-name;
                       }
                       leaf priority {
                           description "Designated router priority";
                           type uint8;  // The type is a constraint on
                                        // valid values for "priority".
                       }
                       leaf metric {
                           type uint16 {
                               range 1..65535;
                           }
                       }
                       leaf dead-interval {
                           units seconds;
                           type uint16 {
                               range 1..65535;
                           }
                       }
                   }
               }
           }
       }

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6244 (draft-ietf-netmod-arch-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Architecture for Network Management Using NETCONF and YANG
Publication Date    : June 2011
Author(s)           : P. Shafer
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG