Re: [netmod] 6087bis update

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Sun, 05 March 2017 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C4B1294DB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hx1KcjylU21W for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0094.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B8A129488 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:16:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=FDK7Nuo8JOOSAuiLzjpU3bXYsjfKdX0L5t3PlpM2/xo=; b=VBa1tcTnBL+NHlWzVIauGQ6DRfQcqjpl9/0bkpKgKgw3WSRQUqrh3JqvfMDTkuD4AreI/zEIKfTUL9LuFLDprUWJMFSFqTmk4ZZ914kHmSv+u1YogSzYdk1iEpvQiQGQM3Xzhc1VfUnx60tMc1IQGnROSXVq0bS5jp7rRURXM44=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.961.8; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:16:51 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0961.008; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:16:51 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] 6087bis update
Thread-Index: AQHSle5hSa0JfhFDXEekQkaWOjcTt6GGa+0A
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:16:51 +0000
Message-ID: <FE6CD9F5-FA26-4B37-AB0E-8FB58CC86F27@juniper.net>
References: <CABCOCHShiTatzBDsefC7RUaompND88Qu+gXYuCTPgL=QRk2aVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHShiTatzBDsefC7RUaompND88Qu+gXYuCTPgL=QRk2aVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
authentication-results: yumaworks.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;yumaworks.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1442; 7:8RgD/Nmk4IuaawPyz85SjkBO+trBfBUjBs/L/4qMfsgz8/4AspSj0PcXsEYJU3C7R1fgv+REEL/wKcV8d/bKydd7bj5fRCBcITKgh34xx0yUu13RPl9CnKN1rrYsKVj6/VIvJ51FBNLZyEicF/bkw1B3G3fVX1KZOcJ9B3eCI1dIilN9tI8pX4uMbXBNwGKCVrgycQ1kxg2iCbNxERGoUkeIixttCqm34eR4rcKBPjjyBa+wAG1uVByPuckN4xvDm7w1KvYmCSmDDm60/pM3DdkbCQDkScGWPc9mX0ZHRtDLFczlw2q2ilc2nX8hZw4oa2d6mhcis4s+qtJdVNU0Uw==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cb068b80-d435-4f3c-7457-08d4640cf166
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1442FA9DB7991F193CDB4BF5A52D0@BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123558025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-forefront-prvs: 02379661A3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39860400002)(39410400002)(4001350100001)(8936002)(77096006)(81166006)(229853002)(8676002)(6116002)(3846002)(122556002)(86362001)(15650500001)(66066001)(6506006)(102836003)(6486002)(99286003)(53936002)(6512007)(92566002)(25786008)(54896002)(189998001)(6246003)(6436002)(7110500001)(6306002)(38730400002)(3660700001)(54356999)(76176999)(106116001)(82746002)(50986999)(2906002)(36756003)(2950100002)(5660300001)(10710500007)(2501003)(33656002)(83716003)(3280700002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FE6CD9F5FA264B37AB0E8FB58CC86F27junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Mar 2017 21:16:51.7866 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1442
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/dOpSYzM_J05Sdmgt-MyYmqJIUz0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6087bis update
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 21:16:54 -0000

Thanks Andy!

  - update YANG tree syntax section

I wasn't expecting for the pyang --tree-help output to be used verbatim, but
am okay with it also.  It's just different then the long-form we've been using
to date...

  - add new sub-section on usage examples

Nice addition, but should it say something about JSON, in addition to XML?
Perhaps that, unless there is a reason to only pick one encoding, examples
should be split between the two?  - just throwing it out there to see if this is
something we might want to recommend...thoughts?

Kent // contributor