[netmod] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-17

Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com> Wed, 18 September 2024 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B037CC15198B; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.355, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTZ4BwuXOkwc; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5BBC151093; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X7r9G3jPsz6HJg7; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:38:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.94]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C17140C72; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:42:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.202.66.22] (10.202.66.22) by frapeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:42:23 +0200
Message-ID: <8d9f88f4-a714-dde7-142b-ca7a114687f1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:42:19 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
References: <a142ca9d-a885-42a8-a966-be65df335ea7@labn.net>
From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <a142ca9d-a885-42a8-a966-be65df335ea7@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.202.66.22]
X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To frapeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.94)
Message-ID-Hash: LW5DF5TOOB5M6WPKQXQDQNQ6AUZXPATT
X-Message-ID-Hash: LW5DF5TOOB5M6WPKQXQDQNQ6AUZXPATT
X-MailFrom: benoit.claise@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-17
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/f6hgpltcVXUw-jxtWc9v487tMQk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards, Benoit



On 9/18/2024 12:09 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of  another WG Last Call,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of 
> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will 
> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from 
> each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
> https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
>
> Thank you,
> Lou (Co-Chair)
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
>