IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: (with DISCUSS)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD52130DFE; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AVl9Q28xyFL0; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1436130DF0; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id g2-v6so950488pgu.11; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JaUxA8kGiFOJZRhj5LOFPs+9VN98w7qPHdVodlsKgdo=; b=ANmUS6O8zv76y/Cp4OTqsMeoFr/GPtwTedDrAvdTEmDmHtn1ESF9OoxoHj4znJn8cY Xnqu2uuFfsVxIEjOlgNpACKFSneRQOPpR4moAWMkkbcAvFxtGqqkZocVLMqRdmCit52s KeBxiix3wbrVf3FA2x3qlE8Hlp/qrIP6O5IvxEAE6/wjr/l4yIElw7viCCtzfKnTSFJF gpJqVpNT/NDyRpJQuKdSbPjAsHGuShDTl95f7Pr4FVUjRfC7LVy0Ruzqaeok1UKuadQw 01AQLNcCNNN+iQBaRmg6ywzYufqF/e04Y0jVvR1jV6Pt+eQsZrhHSWTqN6xgksHH38rw WAPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JaUxA8kGiFOJZRhj5LOFPs+9VN98w7qPHdVodlsKgdo=; b=ctGsK755lRZKbVc0/fJ1mnoaE0GGBxQENReJO7Y5lGo+NweYKVP6wBV4i8R6fVX2QG 6O2NpP9+IBbBgd5xCcYMFwYHTalLwpoiE861BM8nuT5IhMGGeM09jANkEuXxLfiRekp8 WsMfwvPSfrP25BDkI/6qeIHv1P/FHVOVoOdt/1oV8WX1snB5KDd608IF1SEPEWekYHso jANPBknz01UM0puklHjQhPse5kKACKndaIY1/kmYMRKTTb1NTpVrBmfs05wub1NAMpq0 eQonFWz2mxIlbIintU+4cbLTxx1v95qkcz2jFcsbqlBFsGpgQuaHEdNoHVI1wRxuHPqc Q9/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogsx3U+2tChXgIvOb9QqxoxdhuMjUCjsFkSYCoh1S7rKiwSGxIb +K2ehqtN3tJYCOSIMGFdvXU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62Yxs52pfTm30mzPt9bLb9jeEPu3YIwU7ICrxTSkIVqrA1xpLadmuf5UHyaW6j6UsjnGENv6w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e54d:: with SMTP id z13-v6mr8390831pgj.169.1538024100076; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:4f0:d446:54f9:47dd? ([2601:647:4700:1280:4f0:d446:54f9:47dd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p19-v6sm891628pgh.60.2018.09.26.21.54.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <153802301104.21537.2286706947979489902.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:57:21 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model@ietf.org, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A493EEA5-B108-4EE5-8965-EE08CE3B4D4E@gmail.com>
References: <153802301104.21537.2286706947979489902.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/i4IAYWJBGvU7yToBKu7JCLCLNeQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:55:14 -0000

Hi Suresh,

> On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This document is missing ACL handling for ICMPv6 (RFC4443) completely. As the
> ICMP types and codes are different for ICMP and ICMPv6 I think this model
> should be included to cover ICMPv6.

I understand that there are many protocols that fall into such a criteria. As has already been discussed, we are offering the minimum set of protocols for which there is a demand, while giving the option to extend it through augmentations of the base model.

Let us not boil the ocean. As it is, this draft has been in the works for more than 4 years.

> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email