Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 08 January 2018 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2F812D848; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hiAYHL9Ie_An; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A3A912D835; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBP.local ([IPv6:2620:11a:c081:20:109c:f7e3:ded:4120]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w08LxjbQ033690 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:59:46 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2620:11a:c081:20:109c:f7e3:ded:4120] claimed to be MBP.local
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
References: <151544838502.11225.12200905325785852409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <11d17779-1b0b-490a-a245-00712cc35b6d@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:59:40 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <151544838502.11225.12200905325785852409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8773D0B3836302296625BF53"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/iwZNkSmSxpR5n2ILzL-Ks8kdZ08>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:59:52 -0000


On 1/8/18 1:53 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm a little confused on the Security Consideration section as it doesn't use
> the latest template, but does specify SSH for NETCONF, so I'm good with that
> part.  Will RESTCONF also be used as a transport or is there some reason it
> won't be used for this YANG module?
>
> Here's what I think is the latest template and please let me know if sections
> of it do not apply to this draft and I'll drop the discuss for correcting the
> security considerations section.

the security consideration section of 7277bis is the same as for rfc 7277

the ssh recommendation came from you at the time.


          *Comment* (2014-03-21 for -13)

Add a RECOMMEND use of SSH in addition to the MTI to prevent MITM or monitoring attacks (pervasive or otherwise).

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>