IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (4916)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 25 January 2017 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1827A12995F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:09:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZcP9HSthzk0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:09:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1189712995C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:09:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1978; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485353384; x=1486562984; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LnQ8zYU18KREQsrcEMLw7Sc7LsCYJIcmp1sIYWtIYqU=; b=P0E7AWeUFtKnKOW2bqeoXQ+61IiphTq3ODT+IP073BYyoheHrOaRGRVi emDWHtlHEk3X9hTDKb2HLnhjIrmOMbatmMtcMi/1gN3gU1LvF9CGBfzKw yGJ/NsKxvz7q6e4FWI028y4PA/kw8MUxjR5hdKDvCNbanwS8yaHOmjzGS o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CjAQBnsIhY/xbLJq1EGhkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM1AQEBAQF/Kl+NXHKmRoINKoV4AoJRGAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGoGOEEQC0ZXBwwGAgEBiRgOLbAmimIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBASGGS4IFgmqBPIFQhyIBBIkCEYdhilqRc4F3hRCDKoY+inyDaYQVHzgRgQcTCBUVGCOEPA0PgWI9NQETiBgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,284,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="691688658"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2017 14:09:41 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0PE9flw011706; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:09:41 GMT
To: mbj@tail-f.com, joelja@bogus.com, lberger@labn.net, kwatsen@juniper.net
References: <20170124124716.6A187B8011E@rfc-editor.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6c3b104f-ff86-77f5-9b73-49f7cca28f0e@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:09:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170124124716.6A187B8011E@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jbWLCucmlneQ_vWIVuT3DRqqq2w>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (4916)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:09:46 -0000

Dear all,

This looks correct to me according to section 7.17.1
Need one more pair of eyes to double-check before approving.

Regards, Benoit
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
> "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7950&eid=4916
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Michal Vasko <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
>
> Section: 7.17.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> If the target node is a container, list, case, input, output, or
> notification node, the "container", "leaf", "list", "leaf-list",
> "uses", and "choice" statements can be used within the "augment"
> statement.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> If the target node is a container, list, case, input, output, or
> notification node, the "anydata", "anyxml", "container", "leaf",
> "list", "leaf-list", "uses", and "choice" statements can be used
> within the "augment" statement.
>
> Notes
> -----
> It was forgotten to mention "anydata" and "anyxml" as valid substatements in this case.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
> Publication Date    : August 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email