Re: [netmod] 6087bis - Security Considerations template

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 06 August 2018 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39B130EE4 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JSaBvtySmDq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF29130EE2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C9051AE0141 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 20:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 20:50:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20180806.205046.1122451156895376424.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <87muvjges7.fsf@nic.cz>
References: <87muvjges7.fsf@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jumtkcZPqHdoWkk-F9JQtblJGXQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6087bis - Security Considerations template
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 18:50:50 -0000

Hi,

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>; wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Shawn Emery reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10 and made this
> editorial comment:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
> 
> NEW:
> 
> The following should be considered for subtrees/data nodes and their
> corresponding sensitivity/vulnerability:
> 
> However, the OLD fomulation comes from RFC 6087, so perhaps this change
> should be applied in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis in the first
> place. The NEW formulation indeed looks better to me.

What is the WG's opinion on this proposed text change?  6087bis is in
AUTH48 so if it needs to be changed it must happen now.

Of course, we can update
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines even when
6087bis has been published.

If we don't want to update the template, I don't think we should
update the schema mount draft either.


/martin




> 
> Lada
> 
> -- 
> Ladislav Lhotka
> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>