Re: [netmod] 6087bis

Hi,

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Shawn Emery reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10 and made this
> editorial comment:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
> 
> NEW:
> 
> The following should be considered for subtrees/data nodes and their
> corresponding sensitivity/vulnerability:
> 
> However, the OLD fomulation comes from RFC 6087, so perhaps this change
> should be applied in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis in the first
> place. The NEW formulation indeed looks better to me.

What is the WG's opinion on this proposed text change?  6087bis is in
AUTH48 so if it needs to be changed it must happen now.

Of course, we can update
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines even when
6087bis has been published.

If we don't want to update the template, I don't think we should
update the schema mount draft either.

/martin

> 
> Lada
> 
> -- 
> Ladislav Lhotka
> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 

Re: [netmod] 6087bis - Security Considerations template