IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] augment target statements

Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> Tue, 24 January 2017 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F671294AC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jbt0shtQXw8k for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kalendar.cesnet.cz (kalendar.cesnet.cz [IPv6:2001:718:1:1f:50:56ff:feee:34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B90129458 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by kalendar.cesnet.cz (Postfix, from userid 999) id C15EE6052B; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:11:34 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=kalendar; t=1485249094; bh=OZu0/L578YfYzwddgqJYZOjcBK3jSQVx3cUgkoOA6t4=; h=To:Date:Subject:From; b=dbETSAGdGgBHUHanM8H77MRk5MyZrhJPIe5bGyxYj1Bo2ej6nfSfL2Qcoraj5fx2e B+nJRpzFgHmZRPngnV/YnLJIIT1bIqt06FDTN826aYU/By+p5I7/bFp/aYS0VPbihl vIDktMMH2/Aw/1hDfD3yLK7GD6peXLUsr5TEhIKI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
To: netmod <netmod@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.3.19
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:11:34 +0100
Message-ID: <79d3-58871a80-f-4410ef80@3855248>
X-Forward: 2001:67c:1220:80c:b56a:f165:17b6:8ac5
From: Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/mOHvKrYob0vyGETOL-BWnivu9W0>
Subject: [netmod] augment target statements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:11:38 -0000

Hi,
we have noticed that RFC 7950 page 120, when mentioning augment substatements targeting container, list, case, input, output, and notification, skips "anydata" and "anyxml". Based on the next section 7.17.1. and the grammar, it seems not intentional and we wanted to submit errata.

Also, in the same paragraph, the target notification is allowed and mentioned, but action not. Again, is that intentional or just an oversight? Thanks.

Kind regards,
Michal Vasko

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email