IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] diffserv model questions

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 18 May 2015 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEAB1A007A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJWmgbZUQVSK for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C811A0102 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A44134E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.220]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id GRdHSBuWigeH for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D669A2002B for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voXVXlK576Bw; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0881E20013; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 68A733352D8E; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:20:36 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150518172036.GB48290@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: netmod@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/me_ZyDdbTG2_MYIxcMut_rSNT7s>
Subject: [netmod] diffserv model questions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:20:54 -0000

Hi,

what is the purpose of the feature policy-template-support in
draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-01.txt? Can I use the model
without this feature?

I also note that no implementable object is left in
ietf-diffserv-policy if I do not support the feature
policy-template-support. Is this useful?

Is it a bug or a feature to support inline classifier definitions? Is
it correct that actions are always 'inline' so to say? Is this a bug
or a feature?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email