Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct 5, 2016)

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 22 September 2016 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D8612BAC5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fapZ_dZf4b5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0100.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA0F12B8D8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ehnRDv1hDPH+wgRQS4DlKjYGavbm5VxcihkCETqcX8w=; b=k+JKVu35DwOOZ5AAn2TZuqUKKBRtkU0D3hbg6yp8jllQ/B4TjL55xcgIHHUhK8dQZo3+2J2H+C82OGoF6pn+T2GUZflp5/iaS4pF0buuuaXdnao6qdpv8oWN51oBZ3pjCZ/oNXNsEm5hJPNWuvgbZ0H6FP0+qLH+jOHhqGNq3qA=
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.152) by DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.224.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.639.2; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:42:58 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.224.152]) by DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.224.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0639.005; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:42:58 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct 5, 2016)
Thread-Index: AQHSFRpJGB9RYPHSDE+iTibz6mv7yA==
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:42:58 +0000
Message-ID: <B6C963D9-8067-4743-93C0-42C43E32454E@juniper.net>
References: <FF9788DC-4444-4B3F-8F88-5D8978DFBA4A@juniper.net> <7F859F89F9B4DD4DB902232F9E2DAC08387893C8@ESGSCMB103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F859F89F9B4DD4DB902232F9E2DAC08387893C8@ESGSCMB103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.1.160916
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5227f675-b97a-43a3-f379-08d3e3316bae
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0501MB1455; 6:oW180DyVHiH9Qu2nzg3Rv5p1KnjvT0V2S6JpEGlTZdvZzbhUukNOggBH4oPlWpff5fW9JS8ycwpW1i/NMZorusEsnFS5JQUJysijXQivw2MX4axAhNAazO07CeZWMKPnjwYZvHD5Fy0y4V4TWKAmGnep0UBA45G21zjc1WlKplxHWKAEaS6d8sUxMq8UWv5G8d5RogbZgqxKBgKrLPcNt6xStexSBgIRtW+jk8BImpofTd3SrDIo7GDhyC+qjneP0yL+4NsKjRXO99P+24bweagMOH0L7YhdG6CDC6Ufv/iJEviYsjAQ6Waa40ySAiFZJM76FRD3kQ/NmESR9opyAA==; 5:tVv5dv+FSir8C+OivON/rsFF6KZ1DGCqiHUZQ9otrVc1KxXyDqK02oiryR6STixnXk4XbX089uBeZS6L/+jH2itAq/v76UQJuwgspSDmt+PFQXcV7rJtEf67ZjnJ1fMZnRWUgfqqLr4Ly6oPzf4eow==; 24:7RmqQizha5iHmXYgwJi1gStfdGAGthZmCPbgPY19FGevjfJ0+s88Bv5r15CW4zR3vzcaJcZOI+NyfEeJYM1A2pB3HdOa4pAhr1s9o/wTImQ=; 7:FuLNwQNAWeum3bLlVnEgSnvgI7zDIKnJm6gUx5a9cCehjpNvNE/0qPdMH/eisyh8B8mhMN3yOocnHmXU/TXkk3PYGQML1jKA2AI/EU+AFSNXgXdBmuZ4JY1IRUjt3h2el1C25A1C4RAAywf0fX2+h8UocA2faqhWs7GKSti7Q5L0wuK69rKAm6xtv5dFJKKXr/HDK63FlvYRIu5I6m7yiGwk1Wz9bBJduxhP4R5ErDrGVr9i6uXprNSsGsScjgNy9w7bxwQZYSLJe0kKFobwaZ2ikZhnYQku45uA6kKKj0DcpUhUAmrufMxUKZyQZ7NF
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1455;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0501MB1455F6EF7D9D2A46B0BF8184A5C90@DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(138986009662008)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1455; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1455;
x-forefront-prvs: 0073BFEF03
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(33656002)(230783001)(19580395003)(87936001)(107886002)(106356001)(68736007)(99286002)(11100500001)(66066001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(19617315012)(92566002)(106116001)(5002640100001)(105586002)(5640700001)(83716003)(16236675004)(86362001)(2351001)(189998001)(97736004)(102836003)(5660300001)(76176999)(2906002)(8936002)(3846002)(110136003)(81166006)(7846002)(81156014)(19625215002)(4001350100001)(122556002)(19300405004)(2501003)(8676002)(101416001)(6116002)(1730700003)(50986999)(3280700002)(36756003)(7736002)(19580405001)(82746002)(83506001)(345774005)(7906003)(3660700001)(10400500002)(15975445007)(54356999)(450100001)(586003)(77096005)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1455; H:DM2PR0501MB1455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B6C963D98067474393C042C43E32454Ejunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Sep 2016 21:42:58.7721 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0501MB1455
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/naXp0dZtXs32W8DH4vB6pI--X5w>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct 5, 2016)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:43:06 -0000

All,

Let’s put this Last Call on pause.   Dean just informed me that a -09 draft should come out over the weekend.  We’ll restart the Last Call again after the -09 is posted.

Adrian, thank you for your review.  We’ll track your reported issue the same as any other Last Call comment.

Thanks,
Kent (and Lou)


From: Adrian Pan <adrian.pan@ericsson.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 4:55 AM
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct 5, 2016)

I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and I am considering to implement the data model in the draft, while I found below issue:
- Operator is able to configure the matches of ace different from the acl-type, i.e ace configured with ipv6 matches while the “acl-type” is configured as ipv4 in the acl, this is not aligned with the model design intention.

Thanks
Adrian
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:46 AM
To: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 (until Oct 5, 2016)


This is a notice to start a two-week NETMOD WG last call for the document:

               Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model
               https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08

Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday, October 5, 2016.

We are particularly interested in statements of the form:
  * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and found no issues.
  * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08 and found the following issues: ...

As well as:
 * I have implemented the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08.
  * I am implementing the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08.
  * I am considering to implement the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08.
  * I am not considering to implement the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-08.

Thank you,
NETMOD WG Chairs