Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis: Comment on node-instance-identifier

Schönwälder, Jürgen <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 04 November 2019 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F68A120D9F; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 02:32:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jacobsuniversity.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNr7Xs2H6LnH; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 02:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am5eur02on0626.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe07::626]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A00C12096E; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 02:32:49 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jVnehVBL90GLHV+7Hs8NaTbQEcL7YU0H4an+vr04mSjSpdfgh/ObHgPgwhQiBOKZKuXfnvbcF08DaR6mGXxzYrkUUOEmMSPYu2tdJE3XWBRm4p2xSUFjwvELTeOWWgxZo3OKMVKL2W8OII5W3Rs41zzY2n3DvETeS36bVtCXPmFj2pXvZEoSVp/Doa7n8DpK/0kD+Ztor4Q+nBqTBn9+ON4MHeo+gkRVkrmVcM1VB4zzRKud7BbEqqty/2Wrcu+WbQcVTMm3ZdkZF2tI0S0LcXBZLvLvHFMsrfj6Auz1wFddhamNAyh4HsQWv6Bvwvjgew8nK0SChek761+Z/cPgZA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=45jM6f2FzjjtlgjmEvyvsxQYWiTuBZshGzDxTKRqf6Y=; b=KJ80zuyiepU7hn/Paui5n/XsJcKoUn2X1YOmcel1Ag/fFkYkKZMywMx27lkWkkl8i/bNO6cDt1FRIdt5VvBMmEiB74rlR79rn+bTORC+kSS5JDRCSsKJEB249yTwd0T/sjqjFtfImJoflgl/nEMYEeTrzU2AVeNqBl35Q58LH7lHH2qbTuI/9hvu1kokFDbeLVAyGJ5/1YriTBOAe3SLDLYVeTR0jJTNSCjMOO0pF6VtePHZbU54H9RrrBCuVs2Qo8CEs3L2BpYrvIzNPDy7HvnoRjff0xju+/sYJ5kkhfNdsglN/W/Slm7ZzGerNFkBpn39OwYKc+QZTmUT0rbjFA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jacobs-university.de; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=jacobs-university.de; dkim=pass header.d=jacobs-university.de; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jacobsuniversity.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-jacobsuniversity-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=45jM6f2FzjjtlgjmEvyvsxQYWiTuBZshGzDxTKRqf6Y=; b=C/3uvnAQeR4wHu4qJEAXInGOWh0n0b2fGsPsyBRzIDS8N6pw1QdkIlCT+qK7Rq+3KKa0wDjTi2YGKqKYx/kbf5MklB0j//o4EeKaiMTChEJN7Q+c8YpUqclTMqfaSvGOL3Ck4RPlKm5xjQH+kIg5RSERp6JPqj3KCg/N43/n7WU=
Received: from AM5P190MB0482.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.161.65.11) by AM5P190MB0404.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.161.89.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.24; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:32:43 +0000
Received: from AM5P190MB0482.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::6c6c:2cd2:11dd:2aff]) by AM5P190MB0482.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::6c6c:2cd2:11dd:2aff%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:32:43 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sch=F6nw=E4lder=2C_J=FCrgen?= <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis: Comment on node-instance-identifier
Thread-Index: AQHVd5nQOVGwGhgsU06aTZqPuhuJ4qd7BywA
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:32:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20191104103242.prnszis5olcfzcyl@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <9878ec54-4b3b-e83c-a60c-973478de11f4@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9878ec54-4b3b-e83c-a60c-973478de11f4@cisco.com>
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sch=F6nw=E4lder=2C_J=FCrgen?= <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: AM3PR05CA0113.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:207:2::15) To AM5P190MB0482.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:206:1d::11)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:638:709:5::7]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: eee92065-3f27-48a0-af18-08d761125383
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5P190MB0404:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5P190MB040400F05FDAC45B9DCB2AA8DE7F0@AM5P190MB0404.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0211965D06
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39850400004)(396003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(43066004)(14454004)(76176011)(6916009)(305945005)(7736002)(186003)(6306002)(86362001)(6486002)(46003)(446003)(11346002)(6436002)(102836004)(6512007)(476003)(486006)(229853002)(316002)(786003)(8676002)(478600001)(4326008)(8936002)(6116002)(81156014)(81166006)(99286004)(54906003)(25786009)(6506007)(6246003)(14444005)(386003)(52116002)(256004)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66946007)(3450700001)(66476007)(5660300002)(2906002)(45776006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(1076003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5P190MB0404; H:AM5P190MB0482.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jacobs-university.de does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: IzEgq2lh9/tZC7fVmrOFzg2GWeQ00Y294ROqeQZqBB8MkEwwJF+NAbsI6dcSjzLSkb3X6oawk2aKBsWilaNGCpBr9FLaR2eLhnLRwvWM+TYGcOHIB4DJF3NV2ZOH0gO8w4IUoI+6VjPyig61F/eY4I3qwueFscdBpUIRifVO107qxQ9ybNvH0YG9L6qEpiwObDO9jej1tXTKn7pDbHZw1lVd2qYSllMYcZPj1ZYKs/lO3W0ZK/E2W7jnwxNUKXGvoCTuXWKyAljW2txWgLG1+HFI698LT+vXNPU2WdrMz2mb7fuTD/tviRygM/uCuUc0hPPZMqELKIpQuYke/wb1pCqZI0XRQPLRyeJIP5GLDd8TDV5v/U8GZIjizWSsQ2CzZjiVs09oLbBsj9DUjRVXYNBV8qS1HJ1UGOZADAtqz6kSygnTqb6pdp6UDUt4zFBO2mUWaUe/rYify7Cpz3uPqdbdzwA+8s6203LHaIxFM1g=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <48F94C6F2A1AAF4D82A5F0AEFA494CE2@EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jacobs-university.de
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: eee92065-3f27-48a0-af18-08d761125383
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2019 10:32:43.6378 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f78e973e-5c0b-4ab8-bbd7-9887c95a8ebd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YaD4Pbao9FhRerHPq2TK6kJLZX1F+T0WJsvJF+aNOZtpGMuGSwb9WClmUxU9YUxxyblmgYTAq+VZcfABHRJsEYM11u94QJCsbMD9POoctRY=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5P190MB0404
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/nil7QBPX28Wxw9lDU9hyWIy7CQY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis: Comment on node-instance-identifier
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 10:32:52 -0000

Hi,

this may be resolved by adding

     The special value '/' refers to the entire accessible tree.

to the description statement. Does this work for you?

/js

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:17:25PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
> 
> Should the "node-instance-identify" type specify how the path "/" is
> treated?
> 
> I noted that in rfc8341, the behavior for "/" is described in the leaf
> "path" description rather than in the type definition, but I was thinking
> that it might be better if this behaviour was specified as part of the
> typedef.
> 
> Snippet from RFC8341:
> 
>              case data-node {
>                leaf path {
>                  type node-instance-identifier;
>                  mandatory true;
>                  description
>                    "Data node instance-identifier associated with the
>                     data node, action, or notification controlled by
>                     this rule.
> 
>                     Configuration data or state data
>                     instance-identifiers start with a top-level
>                     data node.  A complete instance-identifier is
>                     required for this type of path value.
> 
>                     The special value '/' refers to all possible
>                     datastore contents.";
>                }
>              }
> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>