Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0E83A255B; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:22:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BOb-6M87CamO; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E7D3A2545; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:22:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2119; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583259724; x=1584469324; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MFeWeCoZH4aghwzlVk9/4vXVgqUcmBhckZCN9hYbN+Y=; b=lGBCKeKK2R+P7fagBwAgPcB1VSsxCcshhCmG1Prchuwv3J1q/B5bBcXs 6e4zqnfxnjyiREnAHzlu+tUFN88PCxFQ7s0fqhucdC7QGEP+Oa5rvuZbh V2cFUNdevjrDFMIVYopNWaNaDwswCcSF8zvWXC6NDfHvQbzMovqOCb9vh U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,511,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="23928720"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Mar 2020 18:22:02 +0000
Received: from [10.61.243.157] ([10.61.243.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 023ILxvi006266 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:22:00 GMT
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, jclarke@cisco.com, rrahman@cisco.com, rwilton@cisco.com, balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com, jason.sterne@nokia.com, kd6913@att.com
Cc: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
References: <dd300040-ea42-e505-633f-1d89def980e1@labn.net>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <37c43a69-692e-c50b-ffcf-b47437f35e45@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 19:21:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dd300040-ea42-e505-633f-1d89def980e1@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Authenticated-User: bclaise
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.243.157, [10.61.243.157]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ofvo6jYbabI53jIv52SPX20cRDY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:22:09 -0000

Hi,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards, B.

>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you 
> contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please 
> feel free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft 
> and would like your name removed from the contribution section (and 
> moved to acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
> .