Re: [netmod] YANG library structure

Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com> Fri, 08 December 2017 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir@transpacket.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64971243FE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 06:52:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBqv6C__MrM9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 06:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com (s91205186171.blix.com [91.205.186.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40778126E64 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 06:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1AE154089A; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id om5NneavN0XH; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54600154089E; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gSDmLh43B8G4; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.209.122] (s1853520235.blix.com [185.35.202.35]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E19F154089A; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:43 +0100 (CET)
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171208111504.iwpcck3hkbboryeo@elstar.local> <acd4d422-c260-3f70-c09f-18946a642c02@labn.net> <20171208121434.2vfbrc5pdbwnx3ig@elstar.local> <20171208.150831.2068512524982133442.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>
Message-ID: <dea8ae16-45a6-8cf5-f1b3-59649fe5aae4@transpacket.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:51:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171208.150831.2068512524982133442.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: nb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ogLSN5oSzoQWYWEOHIhwM99yLrc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG library structure
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:52:03 -0000

On 12/08/2017 03:08 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:

> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:08:32AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2017 06:15 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> In talking to some others on this topic, they suggested using a library per
>>>>> datastore. I haven't look into this enough to know if that is a good or bad
>>>>> idea, but it seems functionally equivalent to your first option but realized
>>>>> in a different way. Just something to add to the mix.
>>>> If people want to put additional options on the table, they should
>>>> work out the details and write down a tree diagram and send the result
>>>> to the list.
>>> I guess we have a different philosophical approach here.  I'd prefer to
>>> hear about fresh ideas, even if half baked or asked as a "stupid
>>> question". Sometimes, if not dismissed out of hand, these lead to
>>> something that is a better result than others that have been immersed in
>>> the issue have thought of.
>>>
>> The devil is usally in the details and 'using a library per datastore'
>> is for my taste a bit too little to understand what is actually being
>> proposed. I am not dismissing proposals, but I like to be able to
>> understand what is being proposed. And for that I need a proposal that
>> is a bit more than 'using a library per datastore'.
> I agree.  In this case, I can't understand how it would work at all.
> The library is config false, so a client can never get it via
> get-config from <running>.  Maybe the proposal is a new operation
> <get-yang-library> with the datastore as a parameter?  Or maybe the
> idea is to somehow return meta data together with <get-config>?  I can
> guess, and dismiss the proposal based on my guesses ;-)  Or someone
> can write up a concrete proposal.
I just posted a followup on a relevant proposal in a thread "[netmod] 
[Netconf] Alternative YANG library structure for 7895bis".

Vladimir
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod