[netmod] Rfc8407 - what does this text mean?

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Fri, 16 February 2024 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <0100018db387ce0a-80850b96-bf6b-4978-afde-27d38f36bcd8-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC8EC14F749 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PHXk0WLxMy6a for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:07:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2A7C14F5FB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:07:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1708114038; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To:Feedback-ID; bh=vxsptVmsEZnnFw+hN3gIhFYr02b4is0Ir9tH56z5Jro=; b=O772jFviSwwKbxC3r6tne9vwDfFr7ZbX2ce6I/pWBXwMHPJ0bYq+fDkqZooB931h gIyscvho8NPTgopM5y8tqd+sy6X/P/sox8OyzVGjEU27rC1oE0MnijT58ikC4tctEud eh0nRGxkeHny+zuz4oSXC1BwDn9hBqWrY+T89gmY=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF7516A5-5794-48BE-9994-3B8F9CDF16C9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Message-ID: <0100018db387ce0a-80850b96-bf6b-4978-afde-27d38f36bcd8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:07:18 +0000
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.02.16-54.240.48.94
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/pL5Mb3S1e9UEqzepPtNGwMUBQ1o>
Subject: [netmod] Rfc8407 - what does this text mean?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:07:20 -0000

NETMOD,

An IESG member reviewing one of my drafts flagged a section I had written to satisfy this text from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8407#section-3.5:

       If the document contains a YANG module(s) that is compliant with NMDA
       [RFC8342], then the Introduction section should mention this fact.

       Example:

         The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
         Management Datastore Architecture defined in  RFC 8342.


What does "compliant with NMDA” actually mean?   Are not all modules “compliant”, even if they unnecessarily define some opstate nodes?

Does this sentence actually point to if the document publishes any so called “-state” modules, defined only to support legacy “non-NMDA” servers?

Does it make sense to clarify this text, since rfc8407bis is an open WG document at the moment?

Thanks,
Kent