Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>]

Sorry missed a couple in previous reply.

Christian Hopps <[e-mail]> writes:
>
> Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>> Section 5.1.2
>>
>> The following subsection suggests that there is a "heading" field in the
>> W3C structure/API, but I don't see one listed in Figure 1.


Yes, there was even a blank line where it originally was, na errant D or something in vi. :)

I've put it back.

>> Section 6.1
>>
>> What are suitable references for the "me" and "mola-vik-1" geoedtic
>> systems?  I do not see how just the listed descriptions provide a "clear
>> definition" even for the two coordinate values latitude/longitude.

I've included a reference for 'me', and removed mola-vik-1 b/c it was simply too hard to find a good reference for it.

>> Section 7
>>
>> Thanks for using the template for security considerations for YANG
>> models!  I think that since some of the portions of the template do not
>> apply, they can safely be removed.  In particular, the "these are the
>> subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability" lines can
>> go, and the clause about "can have a negative effect on network
>> operations" may be worth tweaking (network operations may not be the
>> most likely thing to be impacted).  I think it's also okay to drop the
>> paragraph/sentence about RPCs.

Updated.