[netmod] instance-identifier format
Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> Tue, 06 September 2016 08:15 UTC
Return-Path: <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FCD12B0D1 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 01:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SBBwbhNxJa64 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 01:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalendar.cesnet.cz (kalendar.cesnet.cz [78.128.211.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF6B12B0AE for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 01:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by kalendar.cesnet.cz (Postfix, from userid 999) id 89C53602A4; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:15:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=kalendar; t=1473149755; bh=famkPHn0d/5WAVH1E7dwWEbMjqVZJULRTyQ/3eXKVIk=; h=to:date:subject:from; b=pJQewZZomG57RUn7e9bdfxJ6tgeju/K9wo7Ghh1GO/eMdRbWIyxrUB4197uw4s8// xOEbEXrFVwB+gKECn33S9nJPvEgtQcqm+a7wnLahgrEh0hE5X/w5Sm+7rEZbCIRvto KVHbfqIotfbhO7TxVXrWiqFITzMZWqCrtJ5sCitM=
content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
to: netmod@ietf.org
User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.3.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:15:55 +0200
message-id: <3cd-57ce7b00-1f-e0c7560@224973048>
X-Forward: 2001:67c:1220:80c:b530:296b:c0de:8669
from: Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qTixVKbp3Zqf89r-kZGB8zlRvlM>
Subject: [netmod] instance-identifier format
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 08:16:00 -0000
Hi, instance-identifier lexical representation requires (in both YANG 1.0 and YANG 1.1) every node name in it to be qualified with a namespace, but the grammar defines "instance-identifier" to be made out of "node-identifier" among others, which has the prefix optional. So which one is correct? Kind regards, Michal Vasko
- [netmod] instance-identifier format Michal Vaško
- Re: [netmod] instance-identifier format Martin Bjorklund