IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Effect of ordered by user on state(config false) list

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736E0120219; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 00:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GueSleuR58Qj; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 00:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B291C1201E0; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 00:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.41]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9BCB1AE02BD; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:43:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:42:57 +0100
Message-Id: <20191028.084257.135888741597669200.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, i_bryskin@yahoo.com, draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <855ADA2B-6F03-42F6-9306-D72C4A854EE8@juniper.net>
References: <855ADA2B-6F03-42F6-9306-D72C4A854EE8@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 25.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qVcWUpsLFShAG9q0dTxBN634cYA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Effect of ordered by user on state(config false) list
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:43:32 -0000

Hi,

Tarek Saad <tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We are wondering if “ordered by user” has any effect on a (config
> false)/state list?
> Given RFC6020 specifies “ordered by system” as the default order, does
> this mean it is the order assumed for a state list with “ordered by
> user”?

There is no effect "on the wire"; the entries are sent in the order
determined by the server in both cases.  But it informs to the
consumer of the data model that the order of the list entries carries
some meaning.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email