[netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7950 (6258)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 12 January 2024 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12AAC14F5F1; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:48:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TcI0bAptmaoM; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DD8C14F69F; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id EC69D1B65DD4; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:48:38 -0800 (PST)
To: ganshaolong@vip.qq.com, mbj@tail-f.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240112174838.EC69D1B65DD4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:48:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/tq1mGDIVWfPSXRZkvpV3AsgcfT0>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7950 (6258)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 17:48:43 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6258 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Fred Gan <ganshaolong@vip.qq.com> Date Reported: 2020-08-20 Verified by: Robert Wilton (IESG) Section: 5.6.5 Original Text ------------- For example, with these modules: module a { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:example:a"; prefix "a"; import b { revision-date 2015-01-01; } import c; revision 2015-01-01; Corrected Text -------------- For example, with these modules: module a { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:example:a"; prefix "a"; import b { revision-date 2015-01-01; prefix b; } import c { prefix c; } revision 2015-01-01; Notes ----- As is considered in 7.1.5, The mandatory "prefix" substatement assigns a prefix for the imported module that is scoped to the importing module or submodule. So, there should be a prefix substatement in the "import b" and "import c" statement respectively. -------------------------------------- RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Publication Date : August 2016 Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC7950 (6258) RFC Errata System