Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Wed, 17 October 2018 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7F412D4F2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nbvTY0cHp4-z for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57E7C12D4E8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 06:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id AB5D4E64B2E04; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:13:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.38) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:13:15 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.196]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:13:06 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02
Thread-Index: AdRlz2ZrcdhVQBKIRg2w21rqsHkwQf//xHQA//9Ky/CAAOt3AP//ckeAgACdSID//3TpAA==
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:13:06 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BC65548@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BC65175@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <E9770126-7345-4E0F-B03A-08F22D2A867D@chopps.org> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BC65480@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20181017115200.ob2kxlmt2how6jd6@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BC654FE@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20181017124741.xkjnlma3bi42xv2d@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20181017124741.xkjnlma3bi42xv2d@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.150.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/txvHpQ0Cgyxwfwu6GofDxToDppI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:14:02 -0000

Either defining a new module in an Appendix or a subtree, I am OK with either and both of us concur that the draft needs the changes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
Sent: 17 October 2018 18:18
To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>;
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>;; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02

Obviously, this is now a slightly different statement. There are NMDA transition guidelines that have been discussed at length and finally been integated into

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20#section-4.23.3

This section 4.23.3 says under case (a):

   Both the NMDA and the non-NMDA modules SHOULD
   be published in the same document, with NMDA modules in the document
   main body and the non-NMDA modules in a non-normative appendix.

In other words, you do not pollute a new NMDA module with non-NMDA subtrees but instead you create an additional module that goes into an appendix and is only relevant for transition purposes. I think Rob created tools to generate such things. Section 4.23.3.1 also provides some guidelines for creating temporary non NMDA modules.

/js

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:22:39PM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> If the server does not yet support NETCONF-NMDA / RESTCONF-NMDA drafts, then we will need this separate subtree to show the system defined tags.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de]
> Sent: 17 October 2018 17:22
> To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>;
> Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>;; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02
> 
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
> 
> > I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the 
> > operational tags.
> 
> It is not much of a change for a _client_ to read a different datastore hence I do not think this is needed.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>