[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5784)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 17 July 2019 03:52 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3801200DB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZjwjgQXVn93X for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223E012000F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 59763B81032; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: mbj@tail-f.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, joelja@bogus.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, lberger@labn.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bill.wu@huawei.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190717035252.59763B81032@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:52:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uS3L4X0J2U-bMTMN9-aXkxmsG9c>
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5784)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 03:52:58 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5784 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Qin WU <bill.wu@huawei.com> Section: 9.3.2 Original Text ------------- Leading and trailing zeros are prohibited, subject to the rule that there MUST be at least one digit before and after the decimal point. The value zero is represented as "0.0". Corrected Text -------------- Leading zeros before the first digit and trailing zeros after the last digit are prohibited, subject to the rule that there MUST be at least one digit before and after the decimal point. The value zero is represented as "0.0". Notes ----- Based on the rule in the orginal text, the value such as "0.5","0.0" is illegal. So I think the intention of the original text is to make sure the leading zeros before the first digit and the trailing zero after the last digit are prohibited. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Publication Date : August 2016 Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (578… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [netmod] 答复: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] 答复: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Per Hedeland
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Warren Kumari