Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB92F12A0B6; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmkfgV4f1kqb; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7448C12A0B0; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:56:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2161; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1480373798; x=1481583398; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wmppKCbbJUmTdFX29Js3xsM+J0f7WML7tvCsOFf1J+A=; b=PoesLK2+3D8lBMt7Ju+pIvCoz691w15t0z4H+qefxQYRvnn4S68ziErI tLz5G7ImhzNnQE4bXRsSnDOPzK+nCi9klK0ZjbZftzfXB7nANupYU3w1S i6zS0oPcuT8+NVlTmM0+V6coEgMYNWS/8TlI8Zv2rXBew8UDYIS8IMWif I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,565,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="650283725"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2016 22:56:36 +0000
Received: from [10.61.249.118] ([10.61.249.118]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uASMuZE8016494; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:56:35 GMT
To: Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
References: <fcc7ca09-dfe2-61ae-43bd-5e18354f9f98@labn.net> <5CDA80CF-E5DF-4151-99BC-ABF6687D22F5@voltanet.io>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ce72798b-9f79-82be-eca8-2177dad4ff90@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 23:56:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5CDA80CF-E5DF-4151-99BC-ABF6687D22F5@voltanet.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vNHuZSRfob8gA6JcM8yOXRCaTsk>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:58:02 -0000

On 11/28/2016 11:49 PM, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
> Chairs,
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Same answer on my side.

Regards, B.
>
> Dean
>
>> On Nov 28, 2016, at 11:48 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>
>> [NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed
>> that -01 WG revision will be based on both.]
>>
>> Please state either:
>>
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
>> TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>> and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>> response.
>>
>>
> .
>