Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 12:46 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC5E127369; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 04:46:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBZAKhA6SFGR; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 04:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B328512711A; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 04:46:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4772; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515069984; x=1516279584; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Shl7kyTHRFc1P2eC2mBelCnopcZKLkmwG0zBYsCiM6g=; b=m2tXx0GuRqYTbZ5LrHWheotpzePlcLl6MaurrxJP+r07vtypwFhYPj7j w+0KfWOslD8ciXCymw3X7m/+3/fgnQq9ez2AqFSpr3iAYdaYRH3oHSZdE eEr1GG7e1cDG0cscXvWqckwRTK9bvfYEe6Pu9SRfngmUepm03X0xqdgdO M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,507,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="1253886"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2018 12:46:22 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w04CkLZK024135; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:46:21 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org>, Tom Petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <151396733267.27997.4142470279197260306@ietfa.amsl.com> <D662B94E.E5B50%acee@cisco.com> <9019c1c5-ea86-5620-5421-749b4aee35d9@cisco.com> <D669419C.E70A5%acee@cisco.com> <1514889755.4068.17.camel@nic.cz> <D670DDDB.E7E40%acee@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c8a1dc35-c74f-d8ad-4f0b-2b36ca7dbeb7@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 13:46:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D670DDDB.E7E40%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vcEfmZM03DS6HziYhw9G5ULpliM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:46:27 -0000
On 1/2/2018 12:59 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Lada, Tom, > > Okay - no sense in derailing this draft based on an example if there isn’t > consensus. Fine with me. Regards, B. > > Thanks, > Acee > > On 1/2/18, 5:42 AM, "Ladislav Lhotka" <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 17:25 +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >>> Hi Benoit, >>> >>> On 12/27/17, 6:18 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Acee, >>>> >>>> Minor question for the working group and the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip >>>> authors. >>>> >>>> The appendix is about adding a new control-plane protocol. It takes as >>>> an example RIP. >>>> However, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip is being finalized (on the IESG >>>> telechat on Jan 11th). >>>> Does it make sense to keep the RIP example? If so, is the example >>>> consistent with draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip? >>>> Or should we just point to draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip as the example? >>> It is probably better just to reference the RIP module draft. Does >>> anyone >>> disagree? >> I tend to disagree. For this document, we need a simple example to >> illustrate >> the steps that need to be done. Any production module, be it ietf-rip or >> anything else, necessarily involves some complexity that defeats the >> purpose of >> the example. >> >> In my view, the present RIP example is fine. Perhaps we can extend the >> disclaimer saying that it is not intended as a production module and also >> provide a non-normative reference to the "real" RIP module. >> >> Lada >> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>>> Not strong views on my side. >>>> >>>> Regards, Benoit >>>>> This version includes Martin’s YANG doctor comments and some >>> updates to >>>>> the examples (e.g., YANG Library data) from Lada. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Acee >>>>> >>>>> On 12/22/17, 1:28 PM, "netmod on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" >>>>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>>>> directories. >>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. >>>>>> >>>>>> Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management >>>>>> (NDMA >>>>>> Version) >>>>>> Authors : Ladislav Lhotka >>>>>> Acee Lindem >>>>>> Yingzhen Qu >>>>>> Filename : draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt >>>>>> Pages : 77 >>>>>> Date : 2017-12-22 >>>>>> >>>>>> Abstract: >>>>>> This document contains a specification of three YANG modules >>> and one >>>>>> submodule. Together they form the core routing data model that >>>>>> serves as a framework for configuring and managing a routing >>>>>> subsystem. It is expected that these modules will be >>> augmented by >>>>>> additional YANG modules defining data models for control-plane >>>>>> protocols, route filters, and other functions. The core >>> routing >>>>>> data >>>>>> model provides common building blocks for such extensions -- >>> routes, >>>>>> Routing Information Bases (RIBs), and control-plane protocols. >>>>>> >>>>>> The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network >>> Management >>>>>> Datastore Architecture (NMDA). This document obsoletes RFC >>> 8022. >>>>>> >>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis/ >>>>>> >>>>>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06 >>>>>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06 >>>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>>>> submission >>>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at >>> tools.ietf.org. >>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> -- >> Ladislav Lhotka >> Head, CZ.NIC Labs >> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
- [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis… internet-drafts
- [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc802… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc802… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc802… Acee Lindem (acee)