Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping Interface
Pedro Martinez-Julia <pedro@nict.go.jp> Wed, 13 December 2017 08:50 UTC
Return-Path: <pedro@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5529C120726 for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:50:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZkHF_L9wiJz for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns2.nict.go.jp (ns2.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B038E127775 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw2.nict.go.jp (gw2.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.251]) by ns2.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id vBD8oADp034456; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:50:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (mail2.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.15]) by gw2.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id vBD8oAcr034451; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:50:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: from spectre (unknown [133.243.115.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail Spool Server2) with ESMTPS id 243F2D16C; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:50:10 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:50:10 +0900
From: Pedro Martinez-Julia <pedro@nict.go.jp>
To: "qiangli (D)" <qiangli3@huawei.com>
Cc: "NetSlices@ietf.org" <NetSlices@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171213085009.GH9512@spectre>
References: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED2A5DEDA1@dggemi509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED2A5DEDA1@dggemi509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at zenith2
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/4kEXv3Z9DMSM4VGOdtVrVQyGtQk>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping Interface
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:50:17 -0000
Dear Li, We need to do it in COMS to avoid decentralization and ensure coherence among solutions. Otherwise, we would get different interface standards and it will be more difficult for the network slicing to be homogeneous and thus less usefulness. Regards, Pedro On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 08:40:56AM +0000, qiangli (D) wrote: > Hi All, > > This email is want to collect your opinion on the following issue: > > Do we need to standardize the Southbound/Mapping interface of a network slice aware system in COMS? Or do you think this work should be carried out in existing WGs/RGs? (e.g., mapping interface between COMS and ACTN, mapping interface between COMS and NFVO) > > Best regards, > > Cristina QIANG > > _______________________________________________ > Netslices mailing list > Netslices@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices -- Pedro Martinez-Julia Network Science and Convergence Device Technology Laboratory Network System Research Institute National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) 4-2-1, Nukui-Kitamachi, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan Email: pedro@nict.go.jp --------------------------------------------------------- *** Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem ***
- [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping Inte… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Pedro Martinez-Julia
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Pedro Martinez-Julia
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Pedro Martinez-Julia
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Lei Wang
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Leeyoung
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Netslices] Open Issue I: SouthBound/Mapping … qiangli (D)