Re: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to read?
"qiangli (D)" <qiangli3@huawei.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 09:10 UTC
Return-Path: <qiangli3@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1835A134B1D for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNCvNF2KVyeZ for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC161134B2D for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 02:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DXG40440; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:10:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMI401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.134) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:10:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEMI509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.39]) by dggemi401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.134]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:09:52 +0800
From: "qiangli (D)" <qiangli3@huawei.com>
To: "Kiran.Makhijani" <Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "netslices@ietf.org" <netslices@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to read?
Thread-Index: AQHTPRjMPzUEy7ijtUCQaZp0HI08k6LVUsyAgAd6WNA=
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:09:51 +0000
Message-ID: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED2A585936@dggemi509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <cd373a81-6dea-0ee9-7c3a-cd28e516759a@cisco.com> <6EF19FE3-62DD-4254-AD06-18BE41D2094A@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <6EF19FE3-62DD-4254-AD06-18BE41D2094A@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.20.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0207.59DC8E6E.0015, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.39, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 55dfb5a50d7d35d8d1e141bb427629d2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/SocnO_SIwUujdALuaISivz8WmRQ>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to read?
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:10:27 -0000
Dear Benoit, COMS is a subset of netslicing. Compared with the whole and complete scope of netslicing, COMS focuses on the network slice management and operation aspect. Thus on the basis of those netslicing drafts, COMS will also have some more specific drafts. Best regards, Cristina QIANG -----Original Message----- From: Netslices [mailto:netslices-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kiran.Makhijani Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 6:31 AM To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>; netslices@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to read? Hi Benoit, Many of the authors involved are off for autumn break. Basically, we do plan to keep documents active. IMO, some of them need more discussion. Having said that, here is the status of active documents - draft-defoy-netslices-3gpp-network-slicing-01: [already merged in usecases-01]. - draft-galis-netslices-revised-problem-statement-01 [see draft-geng-coms-problem-statement-00 instead] - draft-geng-netslices-architecture-02 [ to be modified later] - draft-netslices-usecases-01 [new revision coming up]. - draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-01 [already updated] -Kiran From: Netslices <netslices-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 6:58 AM To: "NetSlices@ietf.org" <NetSlices@ietf.org> Subject: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to read? Dear BoF proponents, From the BoF proposal at https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/, I see: Relevant drafts: • Problem Statement of Supervised Heterogeneous Network Slicing • Technology Independent Information Model for Network Slicing • YANG Model of the Northbound Interface for Management and Operation on Information Model [TBD] Does it mean that the netslices documents are not relevant any longer? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=netslice&sort=&rfcs=on&activedrafts=on Please provide some guidance. Regards, Benoit _______________________________________________ Netslices mailing list Netslices@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices
- [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents to re… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents t… Kiran.Makhijani
- Re: [Netslices] NETSlices/COMS: Which documents t… qiangli (D)