Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type
David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 14:01 UTC
Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79F1120A36 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idaKrhjYyq9k for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16231120A2A for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id b8so1732228edx.7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mgm6S/u50dh3erTgqEGZHWpbQLNTnrDq86tibPTwc9U=; b=biKv6Kg/6eYMo/lggJTlyxjUg9UKQXHOijGJ891l11DqvEj9zekEQxvLi8X+IaSNUt DYcu2+Ox1rMHbcax2O1QBMIdUrO21rOnkJDVJb7l5Lwyt+v72cMzlvITDnEllhtl+PJ/ /NtKrO1Y4P+z8TMviJlVA23BPP2VZ/qwNrfxCvEsoRSx3M890z98rLDoyVKps43jy8Uv Gmu55E5wntUT3yVg5KRJ5++LUieXxA1wDdQleO8IO97cU6D8K/1QgfO0yYdeoIeM3i+x vVvia9Wpz+Z0HLaYt94s9U+efqx51OszN/QbjU898IBXYzRK2wvxU1eHj+iEMapXuQ/L gCoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mgm6S/u50dh3erTgqEGZHWpbQLNTnrDq86tibPTwc9U=; b=aaz9sO+QW3ZfxSXP83tO3InEb0PInAW88How8QnhA2+FROU6G49xFSZCgAtXJY4zVe HVtER/X9AQ8c2/+tmrPxPaJAvJ7MzuL6bph4lSTqUsQ4prhXVZ0YvwkJxEqsTnICMFTf ivnTrV+XMGNG8jqN/2s8LjzKmiCicCvfFHpF9jC8hWyEi6lJFdnQc+jqUKadhZqt3tqD EAWGpBWCtLKER8r/qW5/ysFBcffwboQeMooz3if2kQ+X8b8hEjKyinMJaUnSgexxHrwB DwRT+tTQibGSNgZBn4Iv6ZiI/mkR5Ful5zM59b7bNplFWWRx/C9NVHmnorc71pgIYIz6 NfxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUpWKx2XgiLbKcuWRpY8gf1LdPVuYeAQdCZuNDCOsaw/ryO32Xn EM9VlUxoIU6CvfKT0DmcnDdXLwjBRb0uMD61fMWETQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdBcJy2FAca2/K6edrZ0LIrKlk45T7S+UCxHyroE4UAjkJHxDcpUEKpRskFT2+LF8H4P6sjjoeKw6Ag1jXLe8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8590:: with SMTP id v16mr2959586ejx.202.1576677696169; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 06:01:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADaq8jdoRUaFJN0V523NkZtQCqX7W_4d14hb10DJGA_n9QYB2Q@mail.gmail.com> <66C93E2F-252E-4B2E-90CB-3E0267DDA76B@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <66C93E2F-252E-4B2E-90CB-3E0267DDA76B@oracle.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:01:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfw+5WP0uR1ziXQyHFq6EpCk5NJV0ntkmnivbBTE7AwUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000016b5f0599fae2ad"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/1bpLCkJIjd8qYmCuJ8-qOkNcRuw>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:01:50 -0000
Since it has been a week and there have been no objections, I will now delete this milestone subject to Magnus's formal approval. BTW, Beepy and I have discussed rewording existing unachieved miletones that use the phrase "submit final document" to "request publication", mainly because nobody is sure exactly when the former happens. Given that we have agreed to do this, I'm going to make those changes to the milestone wording subject to Magnus's formal approval. On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:02 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 10, 2019, at 11:20 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think we need to get rid of the milestone for the RDMA layout type for > pNFS. The target date has already past (it is 9/2019) and given the fact > that there no current document and nobody to work on it now, I think we > should drop this and establish a new milestone when we have a viable plan > to get it done. > > > > My impression was that this was discssed at IETF 105 and the general > opinion was that there was no point in keep this in existence. However I > am unable to verify that. > > > > In any case, we need a WG consensus to drop this so, if you feel we > should do something else, send a message to the working group list, within > the next week, explaining why you feel we should keep this milestone in > existence > > No objection from me. > > -- > Chuck Lever > > > >
- [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type David Noveck