IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Wed, 11 December 2019 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAE21208B9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:02:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8T1xrl6PPu1w for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD6C1208A4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBBJsRvm170081; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:34 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=u/nKR4MOuWn1xg/Up9VWNNwvxxaKYVYVAj12DEGsqtE=; b=IXZ4RsAh8EQJYc7oaJSLCwtghcuO6Txqpqd/Q9tSYJPbIVQHYkE6ayi/kobuBmtI0x5W vdM3Im1Xkgusnv+oSVezF1nfSVQu0xTQbt03Yeg1UdfACv3u+m4XiAWqy7uPdXliFyl7 Gr8jG8HsE552cI+JkC6mVp9WciaihERffOap4mVupBz9gTCXQogVEvwSLqPhuhzSDTym ZwDQAqMOYfokfBXDKQhxSk5u7nOGNrJtPlip4wfx2PkudC37PxELvx5PsOBR67nJsASd meaWEqwvnebrpENHiky7xCUtiVND7e/M6Hnw+1rlbm0NcvOm+WQKS9EY4ZpLrlTKSAYD zQ==
Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wr41qexje-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:34 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBBJxOAp058067; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:33 GMT
Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wu3jytp8d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:33 +0000
Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id xBBK2WDt002466; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:33 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-152.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:02:32 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jdoRUaFJN0V523NkZtQCqX7W_4d14hb10DJGA_n9QYB2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:02:31 -0500
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66C93E2F-252E-4B2E-90CB-3E0267DDA76B@oracle.com>
References: <CADaq8jdoRUaFJN0V523NkZtQCqX7W_4d14hb10DJGA_n9QYB2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9468 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=812 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912110165
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9468 signatures=668685
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=870 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912110165
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/vcMp5YzSxwnTTk5fmNO9Ghp8hc4>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Milestone for RDMA pNFS layout type
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:02:47 -0000

> On Dec 10, 2019, at 11:20 AM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think we need to get rid of the milestone for the RDMA layout type for pNFS.   The target date has already past (it is  9/2019) and given the fact that there no current document and nobody to work on it now, I think we should drop this and establish a new milestone when we have a viable plan to get it done.
> 
> My impression was that this was  discssed at IETF 105 and  the general opinion was that there was no point in keep this in existence.  However I am unable to verify that.
> 
> In any case, we need a WG consensus to drop this so, if you feel we should do something else, send a message to the working group list, within the next week, explaining why you feel we should keep this milestone in existence

No objection from me.

--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email