Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX mode bits
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tue, 24 July 2012 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFFF11E8091 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJLX2VPBrGn4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [174.143.236.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAFE11E808D for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bfields@fieldses.org>) id 1StlAD-00035e-OI; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:53:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:53:01 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "Haynes, Tom" <thomas@netapp.com>
Message-ID: <20120724195301.GL8570@fieldses.org>
References: <20120724193348.GA4977@netapp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120724193348.GA4977@netapp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX mode bits
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:53:05 -0000
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:33:49PM -0700, Haynes, Tom wrote: > In looking at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-acl-mapping-05, it > states that when mapping the write bit, only for the owner do we set > ACE4_WRITE_ACL. > > Back in version 00, it is open as to whether we can also set it for the > group and other if they have the write bit set. > > I looked back at the NFSv4 WG aliases and I see some discussion from Lisa > on how Solaris only ever sets it for the owner due to POSIX restrictions > via chmod(). So, now I know how another server does it. > > What does the Linux server do in this case? The Linux server does what's described in the above draft: unconditionally sets NFS4_ACE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES | NFS4_ACE_WRITE_ACL on an OWNER@ ALLOW ACE, and nowhere else. --b.
- [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX mode … Haynes, Tom
- Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX m… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX m… Nico Williams
- Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX m… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX m… Nico Williams
- Re: [nfsv4] Constructing a NFSv4 ACL from POSIX m… J. Bruce Fields