[nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8276 (7050)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 July 2022 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B0DC13C227 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.962
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.962 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geniW40mlebD for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57F9BC13C222 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 0EFDC4C29F; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: anton.rang@dell.com, manoj.naik@nutanix.com, eshel@us.ibm.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220726193642.0EFDC4C29F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:36:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/45G1ixJR1C9rvu__mT5FWNPiUE0>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8276 (7050)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:36:57 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8276,
"File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7050

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Anton Rang <anton.rang@dell.com>

Section: 1

Original Text
-------------
   This document discusses (in Section 5) the reasons that NFSv4-named
   attributes, as currently standardized in [RFC5661], are unsuitable
   for representing xattrs.  Instead, it describes a separate protocol


Corrected Text
--------------
   This document discusses (in Section 6) the reasons that NFSv4-named
   attributes, as currently standardized in [RFC5661], are unsuitable
   for representing xattrs.  Instead, it describes a separate protocol


Notes
-----
The reference to the discussion of named attributes has the wrong section number.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8276 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4
Publication Date    : December 2017
Author(s)           : M. Naik, M. Eshel
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network File System Version 4
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG