Re: [nfsv4] RFC 7204 on Requirements for Labeled NFS

"faibish, sorin" <faibish_sorin@emc.com> Sun, 04 May 2014 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <faibish_sorin@emc.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D7F1A00E8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 10:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ayi0aS4aHa91 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 10:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC031A00DE for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.34]) by mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s44Hqux0032213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 May 2014 13:52:56 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com s44Hqux0032213
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1399225977; bh=h+Na9sG1Gf6XuR171zsZP0mwbUs=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=jS5qUQ6XZeWCldTvBd6b++h1IxOgcP1KOCt2fLSGrptKqpmB14zw2QqAvwj9Ex5IF l3PwA0wq7yiKiT4uKbP1W8jaTDRe2XW7fTY7sm8JyTq8jGf1GPXUJ5sRoNaGR0K+1v O08Oi+sJ5rsZakxEi2dHhKL9MpHwSo8P5tZI2E1U=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com s44Hqux0032213
Received: from mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.22]) by maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Sun, 4 May 2014 13:52:38 -0400
Received: from mxhub05.corp.emc.com (mxhub05.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.202]) by mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s44Hqbe0029260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 4 May 2014 13:52:37 -0400
Received: from mx23a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.143]) by mxhub05.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.202]) with mapi; Sun, 4 May 2014 13:52:36 -0400
From: "faibish, sorin" <faibish_sorin@emc.com>
To: "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 13:52:35 -0400
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] RFC 7204 on Requirements for Labeled NFS
Thread-Index: Ac9nwaJBfz49aEO0Q/e93he0I0SXMQ==
Message-ID: <C97C2749-F927-48CE-B338-273780A8E1D5@emc.com>
References: <20140417230251.186761801B0@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140417230251.186761801B0@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/71N6lVMKnAJYAbtev_5wQ5SzxFg
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] RFC 7204 on Requirements for Labeled NFS
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 17:53:04 -0000

Tom,

Per your request I reviewed the draft and it reflects most of the discussions we had regarding labeled NFS. There is only one additional used case that we discussed and needs to be added to the draft; server side copy which it is similar to the use case 5.5.2 but there are few differences that need to be emphasized. I recall we had several discussions regarding server side copy when the target server was not MAC-aware and the source server was MAC aware. If you think it is covered by 5.5.2 use case I still think we need to mention it. Also maybe you can also mention the support of David Black and myself in the acknowledgement section. Thanks

./Sorin

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 17, 2014, at 4:04 PM, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>        RFC 7204
> 
>        Title:      Requirements for Labeled NFS 
>        Author:     T. Haynes
>        Status:     Informational
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       April 2014
>        Mailbox:    tdh@excfb.com
>        Pages:      18
>        Characters: 39350
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-nfsv4-labreqs-05.txt
> 
>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7204.txt
> 
> This memo outlines high-level requirements for the integration of
> flexible Mandatory Access Control (MAC) functionality into the
> Network File System (NFS) version 4.2 (NFSv4.2).  It describes the
> level of protections that should be provided over protocol components
> and the basic structure of the proposed system.  The intent here is
> not to present the protocol changes but to describe the environment
> in which they reside.
> 
> This document is a product of the Network File System Version 4 Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>