Re: [nfsv4] Interim meeting for nfsv4 working group

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Sat, 05 December 2020 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A6E3A0AE6; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 10:24:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSrijvkTNPaD; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 10:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp2130.oracle.com (userp2130.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0887F3A0AE5; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 10:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B5INkO1154962; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 18:24:46 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=F2YQY03KK5INKcPXRO3hwMXu0gEbCuPOghY7xKU+fxE=; b=HCqchC4sNzXQ4SBqeAg6aKkNvNtmTlGBlAKir+dJZkZk28TeVrZPgV4poQCZn1b6sfB9 vq6G1OqmwP6cPPudDR4pXl3ScPdQxTuID04bNs+4D3YsoSeekjuRn6RW3XtTVDNo3vQz sXLgXbcHHHmmerot3J8+V31pT17yZjCDfFj6nl15ayMoUe1kxvw6WzV7ipecNi5COrZN Lnky4hEm85B5aSAbtSYhkUtWV/aM9uxsITWr91YA44mp2nyppfHvrRqKEhkocUix4akp kbTCxb0AQKhl2/30oNKoz0Aatv77U75FRBQxO6v+cF92MEzdYwndqpgxd5QObR6t6UM1 xg==
Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3581mqh896-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:24:46 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B5IAKl9194423; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 18:24:45 GMT
Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35820yqrdw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:24:45 +0000
Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0B5IOh58021282; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 18:24:44 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-152.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:24:43 -0800
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <82C11F80-FA16-467B-B4A8-58E0DF3634C7@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C52E4E37-22AA-4F03-AD43-416AE95E0DBE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:24:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jf9BqwbUpy2atq-jzBVfW8xYDBAsFX65DbjL_Xn8kHRdw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, "nfsv4-ads@ietf.org" <nfsv4-ads@ietf.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
References: <CADaq8jf9BqwbUpy2atq-jzBVfW8xYDBAsFX65DbjL_Xn8kHRdw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9826 signatures=668682
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012050123
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9826 signatures=668682
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012050123
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/8efoQ9iWsjTqOO9w5g_ys6MNR68>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Interim meeting for nfsv4 working group
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:24:53 -0000

Hi David-

> On Dec 4, 2020, at 3:43 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We were originally thinking of doing an interim meeting close to the IETF meeting in virtual Bangkok, but I haven't followed up on that, so that, given the holidays and needs for notice, December is not going to work out very well.  I think we should plan an interim meeting for January 2021.
> 
> I anticipate that we will meet some time in the last two weeks of January, between 1/18 and 1/31.   Given that we have had no participants outside Europe and North America, I expect the meeting to start 1600 UTC.  If anyone has issues with the time or date range, let us know soon. For now, I expect the default date to be 1/26.
> 
> I anticipate a single two-hour meeting focusing on work already in progress although we might have time for a few short presentations of new ideas.  Let me know soon about things you want to talk about so I can plan for those.
> 
> I have the following areas in mind for discussion of the meeting:
> Discussion.of rfc5661bis progress including the internationalization and security work done so far in draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-{internalization, security-needs}.
> Discussion of the next steps for security,given where rpc-tls is (approved but not an RPC for a while).   I'm hoping that Chuck will present.
We can discuss this offline to determine a presentation plan.

> Discussion of progress so far and expected next steps for the pNFS NVMe work.   I'm assuming David and Sorin will decide how to split this up.
> If you intend to present or have opinions about what should be presented, let us know on the mailing list. I'd like to be able to arrive at an agenda in the next few weeks.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

--
Chuck Lever