Re: [nfsv4] Proposal for interim meeting during September's Bakeathon

I vote for a meeting too, over three core days sounds good.
Marc.

"William A.(Andy) Adamson" <andros@citi.umich.edu> wrote on 07/12/2006 
10:59:02 AM:

> CITI can host the meeting, if there is sufficient interest. I vote yes.
> 
> -->Andy
> 
> > 
> > During yesterday's meeting, it was suggested that we hold an 
> > interim WG meeting sometime during the week of the bakeathon
> > in September.
> > 
> > I am polling to determine if there is sufficient interest
> > in an interim meeting.  In the past, some have raised the
> > issue that an interim meeting that coincide with a testing
> > event is difficult to manage; others find it useful.
> > Having that feedback will be helpful as well.
> > 
> > Spencer
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4