Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01.txt

I think you have made a good start on dealing with this important issue.  I
will send out a review of this draft after Thanksgiving.

>The immediate question I have is whether members of WG feel this topic and
> document are important enough to promote rpc-tls-01 to Working Group
document
> status.

I certainly think it is.

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:55 AM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi-
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01.txt
> > Date: November 19, 2018 at 10:52:07 AM EST
> > To: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>, "Charles
> Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Charles Lever and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:         draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls
> > Revision:     01
> > Title:                Remote Procedure Call Encryption By Default
> > Document date:        2018-11-19
> > Group:                Individual Submission
> > Pages:                9
> > URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01.txt
> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls/
> > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01
> > Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls
> > Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-cel-nfsv4-rpc-tls-01
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document describes a mechanism that enables encryption of in-
> >   transit Remote Procedure Call (RPC) transactions with little
> >   administrative overhead and full interoperation with RPC
> >   implementations that do not support this mechanism.  This document
> >   updates RFC 5531.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
>
> Minor changes in revision 01:
> - Correct a legal issue reported by idnits
> - Clarify terminology throughout document
> - Add editor's note in Section 4.3 "Authentication"
> - Wordsmithing throughout
>
>
> The immediate question I have is whether members of WG feel this
> topic and document are important enough to promote rpc-tls-01 to
> Working Group document status. If yes, I can submit the next
> revision as draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-00.
>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>