IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] netconfig in the age of RDMA

Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2F712895E for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:57:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUqojglCbEmE for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA7B12711D for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 68so528426pfx.3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Vo0KFlZb1exAHMsoiy+8rYlLJIzYAz6wiZ0FUN1+/3Q=; b=UFGmoExzfOqvm8cjH1ojAH1lQt8w19Lzsjq/T/idHVRIvEkXi+fysSw4XNmK6dDUBe y2FuzFFFCoucCFM0uxRMGtw65SjRWAZjjOwZh5KkOUuBTX4KlcMLHPWk42uQrCck4D8Z HKv1V62mgMThmw5/YNV5M95qHsPXSYn9dkJTonRWg2s0mCt9yN4BzuBdmKg327k1B6B/ opUYl5XBbsazXhMj+PufvP7+LrBsimqljgnmStC0P6G2vHaV6zDH8Je0MPjpvXu3rbB/ gTgJHmuSP4ibuWaTApcQ4xfhXTdZR6ZUDZzc/A3Nt0ctJ7ZqPNPVXL6jzqYQLgjPnQYH ERNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Vo0KFlZb1exAHMsoiy+8rYlLJIzYAz6wiZ0FUN1+/3Q=; b=qu0/esECscMyp9V35pEElJLYP7TkxWeBdX+JBVFS2/y2NicJIYQt7vG9FfCNvfHLHv nXYRRQ/m1jKto32z65zEi89BDdX0bYzywhew568pAxgilHo3+WSbjh6/E+q8QKEgAj9C 9cShWQNorIFMGQgV3IUGJzZDR8UEpXewHQS536fwYOim/c+64eV7VMcyysmGuw+as3Vk iTCLAvWKeh+HKweKr0C9K0nycrb5fvg+PTDPsXGRWabUJvkd4VE/ozKzfLGTQn32DeUW Q5Ya0HJ28CjY+aYnvpL/Q9Q8sQv2dbm2BAPAuA56Die7IGrh+kEnkgrokOcwsisVcFKX KmdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDWR9FSvRUtHTKpJTezJY3ToEZsuWJR2iEG+ioco2yFd3cvaXGw 8HMGovg5suHDo39vI1eSboUU6eO0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvxe9yxPByCUWPhD4B5aBC1oJRoJuIi8AKwKZqDsg48y/8i17wfJMzbItO8Use94RNGkiGfkA==
X-Received: by 10.98.232.6 with SMTP id c6mr27592259pfi.242.1520549870600; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kinslayer.corp.primarydata.com (63-157-6-18.dia.static.qwest.net. [63.157.6.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 191sm41590824pfv.167.2018.03.08.14.57.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <382a1843-2709-bd6a-7187-77888a6e5937@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:57:48 -0800
Cc: nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C0EE03E6-1D13-4F9C-B1BB-CC1C4CAA5374@gmail.com>
References: <382a1843-2709-bd6a-7187-77888a6e5937@gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/GzrONiCkltKrB2GJ2rStawwoHiQ>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] netconfig in the age of RDMA
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 22:57:53 -0000

Wrong mailing list? /etc/netconfig sounds like something you
should ask about on the Linux NFS mailing list.

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:52 PM, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm looking for sage advice on the purpose of etc/netconfig?
> 
> I've been having problems with the usual default, as it
> seems to willy-nilly change IPv6 to IPv4.  And otherwise
> give preference to IPv4, no matter how DNS is configured.
> 
> It has no RDMA capability.
> 
> But it does have, in addition to the expected TCP and UDP,
> many other unknown capabilities: "netpath", "visible",
> "circuit_v", "datagram_v", "circuit_n", "datagram_n" --
> and an awful lot of obsolete COTS and CLTS references.
> 
> Is this of any use in this century, or can it be tossed?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email