IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11.txt

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 27 November 2020 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC2B3A1050; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:36:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3EGz-MU22LY; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF2E3A1036; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0AR2aHeJ030431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:36:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:36:16 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201127023616.GI34187@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <160614418727.31910.14092299087405779612@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR0702MB37723001B8EF834DB316892395FC0@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB37723001B8EF834DB316892395FC0@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/M1amEcIKoSf70pSEakuvKw-aj34>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 02:36:26 -0000

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 03:29:16PM +0000, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
> 
> This update is a minor changes due to feedback from Russ Housley about some
> not aligned terminology that we got during the actual assignment. Chuck has
> drafted this and Russ are happy with it. I see no issues with the changes.
> It would be good if the WG participants check the changes. 

The changes look good to me.

> I thought it was best that the document was updated directly, rather than
> introduce these changes in AUTH48. Especially as this document are now in
> the MISSREF status due to the DTLS related drafts and the TLS Channel
> Binding (ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13). The last is likely the
> one that will take the longest time, as the other already are with the AD.

Yes, the last one is still in the WG and needs a few more reviews.  It got
some attention recently, but I should probably solicit more reviews from
TLS WG members as well.

Thanks,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email