Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-13.txt

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 10 August 2017 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCF91323C7; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4YEqeaohQD9; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4091323A5; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s143so9570057ywg.1; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WoFGgDALwENjjgZWe+lhV87E9S/qk+1/dA2kXuU+h24=; b=Um0d4ZCmcNFYqyMSFV7bK0rZpwXLSd9LOwYtrQWW+mw2ydVl0pfEK/n8Z2dYYwhiLa EF4t3BxA7QcrFl+EZjQw3Mc9c4yjwf1IDCh8LdPUc9BZ0VCzpyVT/2Gp141/RtST1QLk pShNnpdwIwV5J/7rEranU0aFVfpnMvf1dZZAI+kT+9jTbIjSzop4qj6Vrn+WWPucyvYJ 3ceJL5IeUkmV2blfJyhV9PkV7wJ/+wCeh+zvLC6L+DyK2jchPy6V+KOgdOAlm54Hv/YU 7lluffzfAeSZpKrRSL0GkyaDdnQx7hvT6zRu6HdlUmDaJTJKlQMWT30rNGtMU/0jaKew Jd/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WoFGgDALwENjjgZWe+lhV87E9S/qk+1/dA2kXuU+h24=; b=RnqHrQvaYtyzeoaHY54voVCWHb0/MC28kxV6QW07KPumwXMrMZWOxLY6pID36W19Y+ PBjhcDnEyK9pGeSxat37zV1jltxhBfYUJsaqTIKEEhCXjdj5dgMq0qApmpjhg0dVcV3X R4ohHQYf1Fn9+yibOu5kwvLT2o4M5PUXjHJFOSX1d2ZYimfnBDzL7SMjBTRLPf6w9r7a 4Yo54iv2mElTqM4VJlyH8ujyLQwEW7OS+YxQTnF8XC/hC30hhKo8JjMAulY46yMHQhFa bdyuiUMrLSQfA6iofa62J5CDTlhx+6iRBzezb+0jKspi3c1RnXyQTBplGVNu4gLJH5w1 GUTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jcYWFEg530lO7NZ22/tdV5NMZDKKQ9S9I7zv4vZJGlm4qkT5d9 yTh9eOPbLNTC3PqoA4ja2JIKK9cEItNG
X-Received: by 10.13.210.67 with SMTP id u64mr10635165ywd.218.1502388592208; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.52.79 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0C8C6993-5345-4BBA-91F1-86BEE8447C69@oracle.com>
References: <150237665850.11920.17448823328811480238@ietfa.amsl.com> <0C8C6993-5345-4BBA-91F1-86BEE8447C69@oracle.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:09:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eu4+B0=6mCM00cXQnMvgHaDb_Mbpip0wg1NQiCCsjGXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: nfsv4-ads@ietf.org, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e7e305a729005566a1ad9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/PXEshk0ndTfXPjPWHWSbXhvB2Sc>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-13.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:09:55 -0000

Hi, Chuck,

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Hello Spencer-
>
> Revision -13 is ready to proceed with IESG LC.
>

I agree. I'm reaching for the button now.

This nit didn't stop me issuing Last Call on this draft, but to me, the new
text in

"An Upper Layer Binding specifies this agreement for one version or more
versions of one RPC program"

would be less clunky it read "one or more versions".

If that seems right, you can fold this into the next revision that you
submit.

And thanks for the quick turnaround.

Spencer