Re: [nfsv4] Directory delegations, take 2

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@Sun.COM> Wed, 22 October 2003 16:40 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA17069 for <nfsv4-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ACM1r-0001Bk-4l for nfsv4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:11 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h9MGeB5v004565 for nfsv4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:11 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ACM1p-0001BG-TY for nfsv4-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA17049 for <nfsv4-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ACM1o-0007aE-00 for nfsv4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ACM1n-0007aB-00 for nfsv4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ACM1j-0001A1-Hd; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:40:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ACM10-00015i-VT for nfsv4@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA17040 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ACM0z-0007Zu-00 for nfsv4@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:17 -0400
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ACM0y-0007Zr-00 for nfsv4@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:16 -0400
Received: from centralmail2brm.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.14]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9MGdFPh024288; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:39:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.central.sun.com (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by centralmail2brm.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id h9MGdF58010456; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:39:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.central.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.central.sun.com (8.12.5+Sun/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h9MGZEQx000539; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.central.sun.com (8.12.5+Sun/8.12.3/Submit) id h9MGZEHo000538; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@Sun.COM>
To: "Noveck, Dave" <Dave.Noveck@netapp.com>
Cc: David.Robinson@Sun.COM, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Directory delegations, take 2
Message-ID: <20031022163513.GB24528@binky.central.sun.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "Noveck, Dave" <Dave.Noveck@netapp.com>, David.Robinson@Sun.COM, nfsv4@ietf.org
References: <C8CF60CFC4D8A74E9945E32CF096548A6D358E@silver.nane.netapp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C8CF60CFC4D8A74E9945E32CF096548A6D358E@silver.nane.netapp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: nfsv4-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nfsv4-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/nfsv4/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:35:13 -0700
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:35:13 -0700

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:38:24AM -0700, Noveck, Dave wrote:
>  
> > The purist in me would love to have directory delegations
> > be symmetric with file delegations, but I grant that the
> > complexity and recovery semantics of revoking a write
> > delegation can get really ugly.
> 
> The purist in me would like that symmetry as well and we're 
> not foreclosing it in some 4.x for x > 1, but I can't see
> us dealing with the all the issues in any reasonable 4.1
> time frame.

The "everything is a file" purists long ago gave up on directories as
files.  Directories may look like files on disk (or not), but they're
conceptually not just like files.

Cheers,

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4