IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] New Version Notification for draft-cel-nfsv4-linux-seclabel-xtensions-00.txt

bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Thu, 03 May 2018 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1BA127076 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TycflrqC_Sa2 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [173.255.197.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA6A1241F3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 6DF79BC5; Thu, 3 May 2018 11:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 11:13:32 -0400
To: "Quigley, David" <david.quigley@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180503151332.GC14163@fieldses.org>
References: <152337099624.13448.11040477333954216664.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FB6B8D57-CEF6-46E1-97C7-E43C7E49752F@oracle.com> <2CBB38A6-45FF-46A4-96A5-5D1B431E1365@gmail.com> <106AF901BBB25B4082BCE4FEC2F79D440627CED6@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <106AF901BBB25B4082BCE4FEC2F79D440627CED6@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
From: bfields@fieldses.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/QN0ac1YnHLL8-82MQKvn91lcHeE>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] New Version Notification for draft-cel-nfsv4-linux-seclabel-xtensions-00.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 15:14:04 -0000

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:36:34PM +0000, Quigley, David wrote:
> Also having them as 3 different LFS ids make no sense. The LFS is
> supposed to describe the format of what you are sending and receiving
> for the sec_label field.

By the way, something Chuck noticed is that the Linux client and server
implementations are completely ignoring the LFS field--they always
discard it when receiving, and set it to 0 when sending.  I assume we
should at least fix them to reject non-zero values for now.

--b.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email