Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-02.txt

> On Aug 25, 2016, at 2:18 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This document is in pretty good shape.  I've read through it and most of the
> issues that I've found are quite minor and could be dealt with in the context
> of WGLC.
> 
> One exception concerns section 4.2.  I can summarize the second 
> paragraph as saying essentially "Gosh, this is impossible".  I assume that 
> there is a missing third paragraph that explains how people can and 
> should deal with the (formal) lack of response size limitation. 
> 
> For v4.1-v4.2, reference should be made to ca_maxresponsesize.  With regard
> to v4.0, things are more troublesome, but the experience of existing successful
> implementations should be part of dealing with this issue.  Although, theoretically,
> one could have a one-megabyte acl, the fact that they don't exist needs to taken 
> into account.

That helps. I will work on adding that information to S4.2 while
waiting for additional comments.

> In any case, once we have a proposed approach to the issue raised by section
> 4.2, the working group will need to discuss its adequacy and, if there is general
> agreement that it is reasonable, WGLC would be in order,.   
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-02.txt
> > Date: August 25, 2016 at 1:32:39 PM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Network File System (NFS) Upper Layer Binding To RPC-Over-RDMA
> >        Author          : Charles Lever
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-02.txt
> >       Pages           : 12
> >       Date            : 2016-08-25
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document specifies Upper Layer Bindings of Network File System
> >   (NFS) protocol versions to RPC-over-RDMA transports.  These bindings
> >   are required to enable RPC-based protocols to use direct data
> >   placement on RPC-over-RDMA transports.  This document obsoletes RFC
> >   5667.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis/
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-02
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5667bis-02
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> I'm interested in comments about the readiness of this document for WGLC.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 

--
Chuck Lever