[nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC7530 (5471)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 02 February 2024 21:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E14C14F5E8; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:54:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJBEpYpsepeM; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE92EC14F61C; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 962811C0027B; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:54:55 -0800 (PST)
To: tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de, thomas.haynes@primarydata.com, dave_noveck@dell.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240202215455.962811C0027B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:54:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Snio5Bt7Y25TPbGZaizHpN9hU_s>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC7530 (5471)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 21:54:59 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7530, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5471 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> Date Reported: 2018-08-18 Verified by: RFC Editor Sections 10.2.2 and 16.16.5 say: Original Text ------------- Attempted recovery of a delegation that the client has no record of, typically because they were invalidated by conflicting requests, will result in the error NFS4ERR_BAD_RECLAIM. o NFS4ERR_BAD_RECLAIM is returned if the other error conditions do not apply and the server has no record of the delegation whose reclaim is being attempted. Corrected Text -------------- Attempted recovery of a delegation that the client has no record of, typically because they were invalidated by conflicting requests, will result in the error NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD. o NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD is returned if the other error conditions do not apply and the server has no record of the delegation whose reclaim is being attempted. Notes ----- The the defined error is NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD -------------------------------------- RFC7530 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-35) -------------------------------------- Title : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol Publication Date : March 2015 Author(s) : T. Haynes, Ed., D. Noveck, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF
- [nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC7530 (5471) RFC Errata System