Re: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)

Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA6721F84AF for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zpiNFy1x7B8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E7D21F84A7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail68-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.250) by DB3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.84.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:29 +0000
Received: from mail68-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail68-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFB03004F5 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -29
X-BigFish: VS-29(zz9371I119bJ542M1432Izz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail68-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=sshepler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail68-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail68-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1340328027157312_11843; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.250]) by mail68-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47C2A004A for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.3.87.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:26 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.191]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:21:52 +0000
From: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
To: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
Thread-Index: AQHNT+VYZZCU4XWDUEeSj535SNcXCZcFio6g
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:21:51 +0000
Message-ID: <039D3CB813A4D544863BB7D4F46A1857041669C1@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20120621193651.1351.1511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120621193651.1351.1511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:22:00 -0000

Great news that we are re-chartered.  Please take a brief moment to review the milestones.
If you have ownership of something that will be delivered in a milestone, please focus
on the delivery dates and let me know if there will be shifts in the schedule so that I may
notify our area director.

Spencer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of The IESG
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:37 PM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: nfsv4 WG
> Subject: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4
> (nfsv4)
> 
> The Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) working group in the Transport
> Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please
> contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs.
> 
> Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
> ------------------------------------------------
> Current Status: Active Working Group
> 
> Chairs:
>   Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
>   Brian Pawlowski <beepy@netapp.com>
> 
> Technical advisors:
>   Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
> 
> Assigned Area Director:
>   Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
> 
> Mailing list
>   Address: nfsv4@ietf.org
>   To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>   Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/
> 
> Charter of Working Group:
> 
> NFS Version 4 is the IETF standard for file sharing. To maintain NFS Version 4's
> utility and currency, the working group is chartered to maintain the existing
> NFSv4, NFSv4.1, Federated Namespace, and related specifications. The
> working group will also consider a new
> NFSv4 minor version in the form of NFSv4.2 and supporting protocols. Finally,
> deployment guidance will be collected for deployments of the NFSv4 FedFS
> implementations and their interaction with integration with new user
> authentication models.
> 
> Maintenance
> 
> The working group has found that as NFSv4 implementations mature and
> deployments continue, clarifications to existing RFCs are needed.
> These clarifications assist vendors in delivering quality and interoperable
> implementations. The working group is chartered with the vetting of the
> issues and determining correctness of submitted errata.  In the case that the
> needed changes are inappropriate for the errata system, the working group
> will assist in publication of RFCs that provide either editorial modification to
> original RFCs or best practices RFCs.  The completion of RFC3530bis is the first
> work item.  RFCs expected to generate the most discussion or activity
> are: RFC 5661, RFC 5662, RFC 5663, and RFC 5664.
> 
> RFC5664bis
> 
> The NFSv4.1 Objects Layout needs some additional clarification that are to be
> documented in a bis update.  The working group will work final issues and
> deliver an RFC for the clarifications.
> 
> NFSv4.2
> 
> For some time, the working group has discussed the requirements for the
> next NFSv4 minor version.  A consensus has formed within the working
> group for an NFSv4.2 that contains the following:
> 
>    - Server Side Copy
>    - Sparse Files
>    - Seek Hole/Data
>    - Space Reservations
>    - Application Data Blocks
>    - Labeled NFS
>    - Simple IO hinting (modeled from posix IO_ADVISE)
>    - Change Attribute Behaviors
> 
> This is a limited set of functionality that can be effectively documented as an
> "addition" to the base NFSv4.1 protocol (RFC 5661).
> Two of the items in this list, Server Side Copy and Labeled NFS, require a new
> version of the RPCSEC_GSS security abstraction layer.
> Thus two documents will be developed by the working group.
> 
> NFSv4 Multi-Domain Access for FedFS
> 
> As NFSv4 FedFS deployment models are discussed/planned, a significant
> issue related to conflicting user identification spaces exists.  User
> identification collisions can occur when an NFSv4 server exports non-domain
> aware POSIX file systems with separate name (NIS/LDAP) services.  These
> collisions can block proper FedFS operation in large corporations or
> Universities with multiple naming services, or in being a solution to join NFS
> name spaces in corporate acquisitions or across University domains.
> 
> To assist in resolving these issues, the working group will deliver three items.
> 
> First, there are a number of constraints and clarifications to the current
> NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1 protocols to fully enable cross domain FedFS.
> 
> Second, there is a best practices deliverable describing methods to work
> around the common current situation of non-domain aware POSIX file
> systems, and in managing naming services to cooperate in resolving remote
> domain POSIX UIDs and GIDs for remote user file access.
> 
> Third, the WG needs to track the new work in the GSS-API authentication
> and authorization space (KRB WG, KITTEN WG, ABFAB WG) to ensure NFS
> can take advantage of the new features that address cross domain
> authentication and authorization issues.
> 
> 
> Milestones:
>   Done     - Issue strawman Internet-Draft for v4
>   Done     - Submit Initial Internet-Draft of requirements document
>   Done     - Submit Final Internet-Draft of requirements document
>   Done     - AD reassesses WG charter
>   Done     - Submit v4 Internet-Draft sufficient to begin prototype
> implementations
>   Done     - Begin Interoperability testing of prototype implementations
>   Done     - Submit NFS version 4 to IESG for consideration as a Proposed
> Standard.
>   Done     - Conduct final Interoperability tests
>   Done     - Conduct full Interoperability tests for all NFSv4 features
>   Done     - Update API advancement draft
>   Done     - Form core design team to work on NFS V4
> migration/replication requirements and protocol
>   Done     - Submit revised NFS Version 4 specification (revision to RFC
> 3010) to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard
>   Done     - Strawman NFS V4 replication/migration protocol proposal
> submitted as an ID
>   Done     - WG Last Call for RPC and NFS RDMA drafts
>   Done     - WG Last Call for rfc1831bis (RPC version 2)
>   Done     - WG Last Call for NFSv4.1 Object-based layout
>   Done     - WG Last Call for NFSv4 minor version 1
>   Done     - WG Last Call for NFSv4.1 block/volume layout
>   Done     - Submit NFS Minor Version 1 to IESG for publication as a
> Proposed Standard
>   Done     - Submit Object-based pNFS Operations to IESG for publication
> as a Proposed Standard
>   Done     - Submit pNFS Block/Volume Layout to IESG for publication as a
> Proposed Standard
>   Done     - WG Last Call for Requirements for Federated File Systems
> draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-reqts-01
>   Done     - WG Last Call for Administration Protocol for Federated
> Filesystems draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-admin-00.txt
>   Done     - WG Last Call for NSDB Protocol for Federated Filesystems
> draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-00.txt
>   May 2012 - WG Last Call for Labeled NFS Requirements
>   Jun 2012 - Submit RFC3530bis to IESG (Standards Track)
>   Jun 2012 - Submit Labeled NFS Requirements to IESG (Informational)
>   Jul 2012 - Submit RFC5664bis to IESG (Standards Track)
>   Sep 2012 - WG Last Call NFSv4.2
>   Oct 2012 - WG Last Call RPCSEC_GSS v3
>   Oct 2012 - Submit NFSv4.2 to IESG (Standards Track)
>   Nov 2012 - Submit RPCSEC_GSS v3 to IESG (Standards Track)
>   Nov 2012 - WG Last Call for NFSv4.0/4.1 Cross Domain FedFS document
>   Nov 2012 - WG Last Call for NFSv4 Multi-domain best practices
>   Dec 2012 - Submit NFSv4 Cross Domain FedFS document to IESG
> (Informational)
>   Dec 2012 - Submit NFSv4 Multi-domain deployment guidance to IESG
> (Informational)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4