Re: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA6721F84AF for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zpiNFy1x7B8 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E7D21F84A7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail68-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.250) by DB3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.84.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:29 +0000
Received: from mail68-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail68-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFB03004F5 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -29
X-BigFish: VS-29(zz9371I119bJ542M1432Izz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail68-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=sshepler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail68-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail68-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1340328027157312_11843; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.250]) by mail68-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47C2A004A for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.3.87.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:20:26 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.191]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:21:52 +0000
From: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
To: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
Thread-Index: AQHNT+VYZZCU4XWDUEeSj535SNcXCZcFio6g
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:21:51 +0000
Message-ID: <039D3CB813A4D544863BB7D4F46A1857041669C1@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20120621193651.1351.1511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120621193651.1351.1511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:22:00 -0000
Great news that we are re-chartered. Please take a brief moment to review the milestones. If you have ownership of something that will be delivered in a milestone, please focus on the delivery dates and let me know if there will be shifts in the schedule so that I may notify our area director. Spencer > -----Original Message----- > From: nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of The IESG > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:37 PM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: nfsv4 WG > Subject: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File System Version 4 > (nfsv4) > > The Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) working group in the Transport > Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please > contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs. > > Network File System Version 4 (nfsv4) > ------------------------------------------------ > Current Status: Active Working Group > > Chairs: > Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com> > Brian Pawlowski <beepy@netapp.com> > > Technical advisors: > Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> > > Assigned Area Director: > Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> > > Mailing list > Address: nfsv4@ietf.org > To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/ > > Charter of Working Group: > > NFS Version 4 is the IETF standard for file sharing. To maintain NFS Version 4's > utility and currency, the working group is chartered to maintain the existing > NFSv4, NFSv4.1, Federated Namespace, and related specifications. The > working group will also consider a new > NFSv4 minor version in the form of NFSv4.2 and supporting protocols. Finally, > deployment guidance will be collected for deployments of the NFSv4 FedFS > implementations and their interaction with integration with new user > authentication models. > > Maintenance > > The working group has found that as NFSv4 implementations mature and > deployments continue, clarifications to existing RFCs are needed. > These clarifications assist vendors in delivering quality and interoperable > implementations. The working group is chartered with the vetting of the > issues and determining correctness of submitted errata. In the case that the > needed changes are inappropriate for the errata system, the working group > will assist in publication of RFCs that provide either editorial modification to > original RFCs or best practices RFCs. The completion of RFC3530bis is the first > work item. RFCs expected to generate the most discussion or activity > are: RFC 5661, RFC 5662, RFC 5663, and RFC 5664. > > RFC5664bis > > The NFSv4.1 Objects Layout needs some additional clarification that are to be > documented in a bis update. The working group will work final issues and > deliver an RFC for the clarifications. > > NFSv4.2 > > For some time, the working group has discussed the requirements for the > next NFSv4 minor version. A consensus has formed within the working > group for an NFSv4.2 that contains the following: > > - Server Side Copy > - Sparse Files > - Seek Hole/Data > - Space Reservations > - Application Data Blocks > - Labeled NFS > - Simple IO hinting (modeled from posix IO_ADVISE) > - Change Attribute Behaviors > > This is a limited set of functionality that can be effectively documented as an > "addition" to the base NFSv4.1 protocol (RFC 5661). > Two of the items in this list, Server Side Copy and Labeled NFS, require a new > version of the RPCSEC_GSS security abstraction layer. > Thus two documents will be developed by the working group. > > NFSv4 Multi-Domain Access for FedFS > > As NFSv4 FedFS deployment models are discussed/planned, a significant > issue related to conflicting user identification spaces exists. User > identification collisions can occur when an NFSv4 server exports non-domain > aware POSIX file systems with separate name (NIS/LDAP) services. These > collisions can block proper FedFS operation in large corporations or > Universities with multiple naming services, or in being a solution to join NFS > name spaces in corporate acquisitions or across University domains. > > To assist in resolving these issues, the working group will deliver three items. > > First, there are a number of constraints and clarifications to the current > NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1 protocols to fully enable cross domain FedFS. > > Second, there is a best practices deliverable describing methods to work > around the common current situation of non-domain aware POSIX file > systems, and in managing naming services to cooperate in resolving remote > domain POSIX UIDs and GIDs for remote user file access. > > Third, the WG needs to track the new work in the GSS-API authentication > and authorization space (KRB WG, KITTEN WG, ABFAB WG) to ensure NFS > can take advantage of the new features that address cross domain > authentication and authorization issues. > > > Milestones: > Done - Issue strawman Internet-Draft for v4 > Done - Submit Initial Internet-Draft of requirements document > Done - Submit Final Internet-Draft of requirements document > Done - AD reassesses WG charter > Done - Submit v4 Internet-Draft sufficient to begin prototype > implementations > Done - Begin Interoperability testing of prototype implementations > Done - Submit NFS version 4 to IESG for consideration as a Proposed > Standard. > Done - Conduct final Interoperability tests > Done - Conduct full Interoperability tests for all NFSv4 features > Done - Update API advancement draft > Done - Form core design team to work on NFS V4 > migration/replication requirements and protocol > Done - Submit revised NFS Version 4 specification (revision to RFC > 3010) to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Done - Strawman NFS V4 replication/migration protocol proposal > submitted as an ID > Done - WG Last Call for RPC and NFS RDMA drafts > Done - WG Last Call for rfc1831bis (RPC version 2) > Done - WG Last Call for NFSv4.1 Object-based layout > Done - WG Last Call for NFSv4 minor version 1 > Done - WG Last Call for NFSv4.1 block/volume layout > Done - Submit NFS Minor Version 1 to IESG for publication as a > Proposed Standard > Done - Submit Object-based pNFS Operations to IESG for publication > as a Proposed Standard > Done - Submit pNFS Block/Volume Layout to IESG for publication as a > Proposed Standard > Done - WG Last Call for Requirements for Federated File Systems > draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-reqts-01 > Done - WG Last Call for Administration Protocol for Federated > Filesystems draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-admin-00.txt > Done - WG Last Call for NSDB Protocol for Federated Filesystems > draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-00.txt > May 2012 - WG Last Call for Labeled NFS Requirements > Jun 2012 - Submit RFC3530bis to IESG (Standards Track) > Jun 2012 - Submit Labeled NFS Requirements to IESG (Informational) > Jul 2012 - Submit RFC5664bis to IESG (Standards Track) > Sep 2012 - WG Last Call NFSv4.2 > Oct 2012 - WG Last Call RPCSEC_GSS v3 > Oct 2012 - Submit NFSv4.2 to IESG (Standards Track) > Nov 2012 - Submit RPCSEC_GSS v3 to IESG (Standards Track) > Nov 2012 - WG Last Call for NFSv4.0/4.1 Cross Domain FedFS document > Nov 2012 - WG Last Call for NFSv4 Multi-domain best practices > Dec 2012 - Submit NFSv4 Cross Domain FedFS document to IESG > (Informational) > Dec 2012 - Submit NFSv4 Multi-domain deployment guidance to IESG > (Informational) > > > _______________________________________________ > nfsv4 mailing list > nfsv4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File Syste… The IESG
- Re: [nfsv4] WG Action: Rechartered Network File S… Spencer Shepler